html_url,issue_url,id,node_id,user,user_label,created_at,updated_at,author_association,body,reactions,issue,issue_label,performed_via_github_app
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/pull/2077#issuecomment-1557289070,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/2077,1557289070,IC_kwDOBm6k_c5c0lhu,22429695,codecov[bot],2023-05-22T14:08:33Z,2023-06-29T14:40:35Z,NONE,"## [Codecov](https://app.codecov.io/gh/simonw/datasette/pull/2077?src=pr&el=h1&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=Simon+Willison) Report
Patch and project coverage have no change.
> Comparison is base [(`ede6203`)](https://app.codecov.io/gh/simonw/datasette/commit/ede62036180993dbd9d4e5d280fc21c183cda1c3?el=desc&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=Simon+Willison) 92.40% compared to head [(`9785c4f`)](https://app.codecov.io/gh/simonw/datasette/pull/2077?src=pr&el=desc&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=Simon+Willison) 92.40%.

<details><summary>Additional details and impacted files</summary>


```diff
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #2077   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   92.40%   92.40%           
=======================================
  Files          39       39           
  Lines        5803     5803           
=======================================
  Hits         5362     5362           
  Misses        441      441           
```




</details>

[:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry](https://app.codecov.io/gh/simonw/datasette/pull/2077?src=pr&el=continue&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=Simon+Willison).   
:loudspeaker: Do you have feedback about the report comment? [Let us know in this issue](https://about.codecov.io/codecov-pr-comment-feedback/?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=Simon+Willison).
","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",1719759468,Bump furo from 2023.3.27 to 2023.5.20,
https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/554#issuecomment-1557607516,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/554,1557607516,IC_kwDOCGYnMM5c1zRc,1231935,xavdid,2023-05-22T17:18:33Z,2023-05-22T17:18:33Z,NONE,"Oh and for context - this goes away if I use `.upsert` instead of `insert(..., ignore=True)`, but I don't want to update the value if it's written, just do an insert if it's new. The code is basically:

```py
def save_items(table, items):
    db[""users""].insert(build_user(items[0]), pk=""id"",ignore=True)
    db[table].insert_all(items)

if comments := fetch_comments():
    save_items('comments', comments)

if posts := fetch_posts():
    save_items('posts', posts)
```

So either `comments` or `post` could create the relevant user if those items exist. In cases where they _both_ exist, I get this error. I need the `pk` because either call could create the table.","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",1720096994,"`IndexError` when doing `.insert(..., pk='id')` after `insert_all`",