html_url,issue_url,id,node_id,user,user_label,created_at,updated_at,author_association,body,reactions,issue,issue_label,performed_via_github_app https://github.com/simonw/datasette/pull/258#issuecomment-390577711,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/258,390577711,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM5MDU3NzcxMQ==,247131,philroche,2018-05-21T07:38:15Z,2018-05-21T07:38:15Z,NONE,"Excellent, I was not aware of the auto redirect to the new hash. My bad This solves my use case. I do agree that your suggested --no-url-hash approach is much neater. I will investigate ","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",322741659,Add new metadata key persistent_urls which removes the hash from all database urls, https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/247#issuecomment-390689406,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/247,390689406,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM5MDY4OTQwNg==,11912854,jsancho-gpl,2018-05-21T15:29:31Z,2018-05-21T15:29:31Z,NONE,"I've changed my mind about the way to support external connectors aside of SQLite and I'm working in a more simple style that respects the original Datasette, i.e. less refactoring. I present you [a version of Datasette wich supports other database connectors](https://github.com/jsancho-gpl/datasette/tree/external-connectors) and [a Datasette connector for HDF5/PyTables files](https://github.com/jsancho-gpl/datasette-pytables).","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",319449852,SQLite code decoupled from Datasette, https://github.com/simonw/datasette/pull/277#issuecomment-390707183,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/277,390707183,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM5MDcwNzE4Mw==,9599,simonw,2018-05-21T16:28:39Z,2018-05-21T16:28:39Z,OWNER,"This is definitely a big improvement. I'd like to refactor the unit tests that cover .inspect() too - currently they are a huge ugly blob at the top of test_api.py","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",324836533,Refactor inspect logic, https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/276#issuecomment-390707760,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/276,390707760,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM5MDcwNzc2MA==,9599,simonw,2018-05-21T16:30:35Z,2018-05-21T16:30:35Z,OWNER,"This probably needs to be in a plugin simply because getting Spatialite compiled and installed is a bit of a pain. It's a great opportunity to expand the plugin hooks in useful ways though.","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",324835838,Handle spatialite geometry columns better, https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/276#issuecomment-390795067,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/276,390795067,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM5MDc5NTA2Nw==,45057,russss,2018-05-21T21:55:57Z,2018-05-21T21:55:57Z,CONTRIBUTOR,"Well, we do have the capability to detect spatialite so my intention certainly wasn't to require it. I can see the advantage of having it as a plugin but it does touch a number of points in the code. I think I'm going to attack this by refactoring the necessary bits and seeing where that leads (which was my plan anyway). I think my main concern is - if I add certain plugin hooks for this, is anything else ever going to use them? I'm not sure I have an answer to that question yet, either way.","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",324835838,Handle spatialite geometry columns better, https://github.com/simonw/datasette/pull/277#issuecomment-390804333,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/277,390804333,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM5MDgwNDMzMw==,9599,simonw,2018-05-21T22:40:16Z,2018-05-21T22:43:50Z,OWNER,"We should merge this before refactoring the tests though, because that way we don't couple the new tests to the verification of this change.","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",324836533,Refactor inspect logic,