html_url,issue_url,id,node_id,user,user_label,created_at,updated_at,author_association,body,reactions,issue,issue_label,performed_via_github_app
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1099#issuecomment-1402563930,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1099,1402563930,IC_kwDOBm6k_c5TmW1a,536941,fgregg,2023-01-24T20:11:11Z,2023-01-24T20:11:11Z,CONTRIBUTOR,"hi @simonw, this bug bit me today.

the UX for linking from a table to the foreign key seems tough! 

the design in the other direction seems a lot easier, for a given primary key detail page, add links back to the tables that refer to the row.

would you be open to a PR that solved the second problem but not the first?","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",743371103,Support linking to compound foreign keys,
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1989#issuecomment-1402347667,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1989,1402347667,IC_kwDOBm6k_c5TliCT,116795,pax,2023-01-24T17:48:59Z,2023-01-24T17:48:59Z,NONE,"The problem (in my particular use case) with using a VIEW is that I'd need one of the columns to be searchable – but that ([enable-fts](https://github.com/simonw/datasette-search-all)) doesn't work with views :/

__
side-suggestion: I don't know how feasible this might be, but when one column (or table) would be marked as hidden, could the _Download SQLite DB_ link take that into account? 🧐","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",1531991339,Suggestion: Hiding columns,