html_url,issue_url,id,node_id,user,user_label,created_at,updated_at,author_association,body,reactions,issue,issue_label,performed_via_github_app
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/262#issuecomment-1385807684,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/262,1385807684,IC_kwDOBm6k_c5Smb9E,9599,simonw,2023-01-17T17:51:54Z,2023-01-19T23:20:59Z,OWNER,"In most cases, the `?_extra=xxx` name exactly corresponds to the additional key that is added to the JSON.
`?_facet=...` is one example of a query string argument that causes an extra key - `""facet_results""` - to be added to the JSON even though it wasn't requested by name in a `?_extra=`.
Am I OK with that? I think so.
Related issue:
- #1558
Actually there's an edge-case here that's worth considering: it's possible to use metadata to set default facets for a table. If you do this for a table, then `.json` for that table will always calculate and return those facets - which may be an expensive and unnecessary operation.
So maybe we don't include `facet_results` in the JSON unless explicitly asked for in that case, but have a rule that `?_facet` implies `?_extra=facet_results`.","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",323658641,Add ?_extra= mechanism for requesting extra properties in JSON,
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1989#issuecomment-1397734424,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1989,1397734424,IC_kwDOBm6k_c5TT7wY,9599,simonw,2023-01-19T23:18:45Z,2023-01-19T23:18:45Z,OWNER,"There's a `?_nocol=x` argument you can use to hide a column when you link to a table, but that won't help you if you need to hide the column for privacy reasons: https://docs.datasette.io/en/latest/json_api.html#special-table-arguments
One solution right now is to define a SQL view for the things that you DO want people to be able to see, and then use Datasette's permission system to hide the tables (`'""allow"": false` in metadata for each table) but show the views.
If you want to redact specific columns there's a plugin for doing that: https://datasette.io/plugins/datasette-mask-columns
This does make sense as more of a core Datasette feature though - tagging it as a feature suggestion.","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",1531991339,Suggestion: Hiding columns,
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/pull/1996#issuecomment-1396933348,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1996,1396933348,IC_kwDOBm6k_c5TQ4Lk,22429695,codecov[bot],2023-01-19T12:55:57Z,2023-01-19T12:55:57Z,NONE,"# [Codecov](https://codecov.io/gh/simonw/datasette/pull/1996?src=pr&el=h1&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=Simon+Willison) Report
Base: **92.11**% // Head: **92.11**% // Increases project coverage by **`+0.00%`** :tada:
> Coverage data is based on head [(`96b8b7f`)](https://codecov.io/gh/simonw/datasette/pull/1996?src=pr&el=desc&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=Simon+Willison) compared to base [(`6a352e9`)](https://codecov.io/gh/simonw/datasette/commit/6a352e99ab988dbf8fd22a100049caa6ad33f1ec?el=desc&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=Simon+Willison).
> Patch coverage: 100.00% of modified lines in pull request are covered.
Additional details and impacted files
```diff
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #1996 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 92.11% 92.11%
=======================================
Files 38 38
Lines 5555 5556 +1
=======================================
+ Hits 5117 5118 +1
Misses 438 438
```
| [Impacted Files](https://codecov.io/gh/simonw/datasette/pull/1996?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=Simon+Willison) | Coverage Δ | |
|---|---|---|
| [datasette/utils/\_\_init\_\_.py](https://codecov.io/gh/simonw/datasette/pull/1996?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=Simon+Willison#diff-ZGF0YXNldHRlL3V0aWxzL19faW5pdF9fLnB5) | `94.87% <100.00%> (+<0.01%)` | :arrow_up: |
Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us [how you rate us](https://about.codecov.io/nps?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=Simon+Willison). Have a feature suggestion? [Share it here.](https://app.codecov.io/gh/feedback/?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=Simon+Willison)