html_url,issue_url,id,node_id,user,user_label,created_at,updated_at,author_association,body,reactions,issue,issue_label,performed_via_github_app
https://github.com/dogsheep/dogsheep-photos/issues/15#issuecomment-748562288,https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/dogsheep-photos/issues/15,748562288,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc0ODU2MjI4OA==,41546558,RhetTbull,2020-12-20T04:44:22Z,2020-12-20T04:44:22Z,CONTRIBUTOR,"@nickvazz @simonw I opened a [PR](https://github.com/dogsheep/dogsheep-photos/pull/31) that replaces the SQL for `ZCOMPUTEDASSETATTRIBUTES` to use osxphotos which now exposes all this data and has been updated for Big Sur.  I did regression tests to confirm the extracted data is identical, with one exception which should not affect operation: the old code pulled data from `ZCOMPUTEDASSETATTRIBUTES` for missing photos while the main loop ignores missing photos and does not add them to `apple_photos`.  The new code does not add rows to the `apple_photos_scores` table for missing photos.","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",612151767,Expose scores from ZCOMPUTEDASSETATTRIBUTES,
https://github.com/dogsheep/dogsheep-photos/pull/31#issuecomment-748562330,https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/dogsheep-photos/issues/31,748562330,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc0ODU2MjMzMA==,41546558,RhetTbull,2020-12-20T04:45:08Z,2020-12-20T04:45:08Z,CONTRIBUTOR,Fixes the issue mentioned here: https://github.com/dogsheep/dogsheep-photos/issues/15#issuecomment-748436115,"{""total_count"": 1, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 1, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",771511344,Update for Big Sur,