html_url,issue_url,id,node_id,user,user_label,created_at,updated_at,author_association,body,reactions,issue,issue_label,performed_via_github_app
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/617#issuecomment-552253893,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/617,552253893,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDU1MjI1Mzg5Mw==,9599,simonw,2019-11-11T00:46:42Z,2021-12-18T01:41:47Z,OWNER,"As noted in https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/621#issuecomment-552253208 a common pattern in this method is blocks of code that append new items to the `where_clauses`, `params` and `extra_human_descriptions` arrays. This is a useful refactoring opportunity.

Code that fits this pattern:

* The code that builds based on the filters: `where_clauses, params = filters.build_where_clauses(table)` and `human_description_en = filters.human_description_en(extra=extra_human_descriptions)`
* Code that handles `?_where=`: `where_clauses.extend(request.args[""_where""])` - though note that this also appends to a `extra_wheres_for_ui` array which nothing else uses
* The `_through=` code, see #621 for details
* The code that deals with `?_search=` FTS

The keyset pagination code modifies `where_clauses` and `params` too, but I don't think it's quite going to work with the same abstraction that would cover the above examples.

[UPDATE December 2021 - this comment became the basis for a new `filters_from_request` plugin hook, see also #473]","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",519613116,Refactor TableView.data() method,
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/621#issuecomment-997120723,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/621,997120723,IC_kwDOBm6k_c47btrT,9599,simonw,2021-12-18T01:42:33Z,2021-12-18T01:42:33Z,OWNER,I refactored this code out into the `filters.py` module in aa7f0037a46eb76ae6fe9bf2a1f616c58738ecdf,"{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",520681725,Syntax for ?_through= that works as a form field,
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1565#issuecomment-997121215,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1565,997121215,IC_kwDOBm6k_c47bty_,9599,simonw,2021-12-18T01:45:44Z,2021-12-18T01:45:44Z,OWNER,I want to get this into Datasette 0.60 - #1566 - it's a small change that can unlock a lot of potential.,"{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",1083657868,Documented JavaScript variables on different templates made available for plugins,
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1564#issuecomment-997122938,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1564,997122938,IC_kwDOBm6k_c47buN6,9599,simonw,2021-12-18T01:55:25Z,2021-12-18T01:55:46Z,OWNER,"Made this change while working on this issue:
- #1567

I'm going to write a test for this that uses that `sleep()` SQL function from c35b84a2aabe2f14aeacf6cda4110ae1e94d6059.","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",1083581011,_prepare_connection not called on write connections,
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1546#issuecomment-997124280,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1546,997124280,IC_kwDOBm6k_c47bui4,9599,simonw,2021-12-18T02:05:16Z,2021-12-18T02:05:16Z,OWNER,"Sure - there are actually several levels to this.

The code that creates connections to the database is this: https://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/83bacfa9452babe7bd66e3579e23af988d00f6ac/datasette/database.py#L72-L95

For files on disk, it does this:
```python
# For read-only connections
conn = sqlite3.connect( ""file:my.db?mode=ro"", uri=True, check_same_thread=False)
# For connections that should be treated as immutable:
conn = sqlite3.connect( ""file:my.db?immutable=1"", uri=True, check_same_thread=False)
```
For in-memory databases it runs this after the connection has been created:
```python
conn.execute(""PRAGMA query_only=1"")
```
SQLite `PRAGMA` queries are treated as dangerous: someone could run `PRAGMA query_only=0` to turn that previous option off for example.

So this function runs against any incoming SQL to verify that it looks like a `SELECT ...` and doesn't have anything like that in it.

https://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/83bacfa9452babe7bd66e3579e23af988d00f6ac/datasette/utils/__init__.py#L195-L204

You can see the tests for that here: https://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/b1fed48a95516ae84c0f020582303ab50ab817e2/tests/test_utils.py#L136-L170","{""total_count"": 1, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 1, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",1076057610,validating the sql,
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1563#issuecomment-997125191,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1563,997125191,IC_kwDOBm6k_c47buxH,9599,simonw,2021-12-18T02:10:20Z,2021-12-18T02:10:20Z,OWNER,I should document the usage of this constructor in https://docs.datasette.io/en/stable/internals.html#datasette-class,"{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",1083573206,Datasette(... files=) should not be a required argument,
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1563#issuecomment-997127084,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1563,997127084,IC_kwDOBm6k_c47bvOs,9599,simonw,2021-12-18T02:22:30Z,2021-12-18T02:22:30Z,OWNER,Docs here: https://docs.datasette.io/en/latest/internals.html#datasette-class,"{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",1083573206,Datasette(... files=) should not be a required argument,
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1561#issuecomment-997127784,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1561,997127784,IC_kwDOBm6k_c47bvZo,9599,simonw,2021-12-18T02:27:56Z,2021-12-18T02:27:56Z,OWNER,"Oh that's an interesting solution, combining the hashes of all of the individual databases.

I'm actually not a big fan of `hashed_url` mode - I implemented it right at the start of the project because it felt like a clever hack, and then ended up making it not-the-default a few years ago:

- #418
- #419
- #421

I've since not found myself wanting to use it at all for any of my projects - which makes me nervous, because it means there's a pretty complex feature that I'm not using at all, so it's only really protected by the existing unit tests for it.

What I'd really like to do is figure out how to have hashed URL mode work entirely as a plugin - then I could extract it from Datasette core entirely (which would simplify a bunch of stuff) but people who find the optimization useful would be able to access it.

I'm not sure that the existing plugin hooks are robust enough to do that yet though.","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",1082765654,"add hash id to ""_memory"" url if hashed url mode is turned on and crossdb is also turned on",
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1555#issuecomment-997128080,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1555,997128080,IC_kwDOBm6k_c47bveQ,9599,simonw,2021-12-18T02:30:19Z,2021-12-18T02:30:19Z,OWNER,"I think all of these queries happen in one place - in the `populate_schema_tables()` function - so optimizing them might be localized to just that area of the code, which would be nice:

https://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/c00f29affcafce8314366852ba1a0f5a7dd25690/datasette/utils/internal_db.py#L97-L183","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",1079149656,Optimize all those calls to index_list and foreign_key_list,
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1555#issuecomment-997128251,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1555,997128251,IC_kwDOBm6k_c47bvg7,9599,simonw,2021-12-18T02:31:51Z,2021-12-18T02:31:51Z,OWNER,"I was thinking it might even be possible to convert this into a `insert into tables select from ...` query:

https://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/c00f29affcafce8314366852ba1a0f5a7dd25690/datasette/utils/internal_db.py#L102-L112

 But the `SELECT` runs against a separate database from the `INSERT INTO`, so I would have to setup a cross-database connection for this which feels a little too complicated.","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",1079149656,Optimize all those calls to index_list and foreign_key_list,
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1555#issuecomment-997128368,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1555,997128368,IC_kwDOBm6k_c47bviw,9599,simonw,2021-12-18T02:32:43Z,2021-12-18T02:32:43Z,OWNER,I wonder why the `INSERT INTO` queries don't show up in that `?trace=1` view?,"{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",1079149656,Optimize all those calls to index_list and foreign_key_list,
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1555#issuecomment-997128508,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1555,997128508,IC_kwDOBm6k_c47bvk8,9599,simonw,2021-12-18T02:33:57Z,2021-12-18T02:33:57Z,OWNER,"Here's why - `trace` only applies to read, not write SQL operations: https://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/7c8f8aa209e4ba7bf83976f8495d67c28fbfca24/datasette/database.py#L209-L211","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",1079149656,Optimize all those calls to index_list and foreign_key_list,
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1561#issuecomment-997128712,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1561,997128712,IC_kwDOBm6k_c47bvoI,536941,fgregg,2021-12-18T02:35:48Z,2021-12-18T02:35:48Z,CONTRIBUTOR,interesting! i love this feature. this + full caching with cloudflare is really super!,"{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",1082765654,"add hash id to ""_memory"" url if hashed url mode is turned on and crossdb is also turned on",
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1568#issuecomment-997128950,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1568,997128950,IC_kwDOBm6k_c47bvr2,9599,simonw,2021-12-18T02:38:01Z,2021-12-18T02:38:01Z,OWNER,"Prototype:

```diff
diff --git a/datasette/database.py b/datasette/database.py
index 0a0c104..468e936 100644
--- a/datasette/database.py
+++ b/datasette/database.py
@@ -99,7 +99,9 @@ class Database:
             with conn:
                 return conn.execute(sql, params or [])
 
-        return await self.execute_write_fn(_inner, block=block)
+        with trace(""sql"", database=self.name, sql=sql.strip(), params=params):
+            results = await self.execute_write_fn(_inner, block=block)
+        return results
 
     async def execute_write_fn(self, fn, block=False):
         task_id = uuid.uuid5(uuid.NAMESPACE_DNS, ""datasette.io"")
```

<img width=""1292"" alt=""image"" src=""https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9599/146626249-cc8609f6-590c-49e3-abab-0cbc132916d1.png"">
","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",1083726550,Trace should show queries on the write connection too,
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1568#issuecomment-997153253,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1568,997153253,IC_kwDOBm6k_c47b1nl,9599,simonw,2021-12-18T06:20:23Z,2021-12-18T06:20:23Z,OWNER,Now running at https://latest-with-plugins.datasette.io/github/commits?_trace=1,"{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",1083726550,Trace should show queries on the write connection too,
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1555#issuecomment-997234858,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1555,997234858,IC_kwDOBm6k_c47cJiq,9599,simonw,2021-12-18T17:28:44Z,2021-12-18T17:28:44Z,OWNER,"Maybe it would be worth exploring attaching each DB in turn to the _internal connection in order to perform these queries faster.

I'm a bit worried about leaks though: the internal database isn't meant to be visible, even temporarily attaching another DB to it could cause SQL queries against that DB to be able to access the internal data.

So maybe instead the _internal connection gets to connect to the other DBs? There's a maximum of ten there I think, which is good for most but not all cases. But the cases with the most connected databases will see the worst performance!","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",1079149656,Optimize all those calls to index_list and foreign_key_list,
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1555#issuecomment-997235086,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1555,997235086,IC_kwDOBm6k_c47cJmO,9599,simonw,2021-12-18T17:30:13Z,2021-12-18T17:30:13Z,OWNER,"Now that trace sees write queries (#1568) it's clear that there is a whole lot more DB activity then I had realized:

<img width=""1292"" alt=""image"" src=""https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9599/146626249-cc8609f6-590c-49e3-abab-0cbc132916d1.png"">
","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",1079149656,Optimize all those calls to index_list and foreign_key_list,
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1566#issuecomment-997235388,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1566,997235388,IC_kwDOBm6k_c47cJq8,9599,simonw,2021-12-18T17:32:07Z,2021-12-18T17:32:07Z,OWNER,I can release a new version of `datasette-leaflet-freedraw` as soon as this is out.,"{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",1083669410,Release Datasette 0.60,
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1555#issuecomment-997241645,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1555,997241645,IC_kwDOBm6k_c47cLMt,9599,simonw,2021-12-18T18:12:26Z,2021-12-18T18:12:26Z,OWNER,"A simpler optimization would be just to turn all of those column and index reads into a single efficient UNION query against each database, then figure out the most efficient pattern to send them all as writes in one go as opposed to calling `.execute_write()` in a loop.","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",1079149656,Optimize all those calls to index_list and foreign_key_list,
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1555#issuecomment-997241969,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1555,997241969,IC_kwDOBm6k_c47cLRx,9599,simonw,2021-12-18T18:13:04Z,2021-12-18T18:13:04Z,OWNER,Also: running all of those `CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS` in a single call to `conn.executescript()` rather than as separate queries may speed things up too.,"{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",1079149656,Optimize all those calls to index_list and foreign_key_list,
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1555#issuecomment-997245301,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1555,997245301,IC_kwDOBm6k_c47cMF1,9599,simonw,2021-12-18T18:17:04Z,2021-12-18T18:17:04Z,OWNER,"One downside of `conn.executescript()` is that it won't be picked up by the tracing mechanism - in fact nothing that uses `await db.execute_write_fn(fn, block=True)` or `await db.execute_fn(fn, block=True)` gets picked up by tracing.","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",1079149656,Optimize all those calls to index_list and foreign_key_list,
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1555#issuecomment-997248364,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1555,997248364,IC_kwDOBm6k_c47cM1s,9599,simonw,2021-12-18T18:20:10Z,2021-12-18T18:20:10Z,OWNER,"Idea: teach `execute_write` to accept an optional `executescript=True` parameter, like this:
```diff
diff --git a/datasette/database.py b/datasette/database.py
index 468e936..1a424f5 100644
--- a/datasette/database.py
+++ b/datasette/database.py
@@ -94,10 +94,14 @@ class Database:
             f""file:{self.path}{qs}"", uri=True, check_same_thread=False
         )
 
-    async def execute_write(self, sql, params=None, block=False):
+    async def execute_write(self, sql, params=None, executescript=False, block=False):
+        assert not executescript and params, ""Cannot use params with executescript=True""
         def _inner(conn):
             with conn:
-                return conn.execute(sql, params or [])
+                if executescript:
+                    return conn.executescript(sql)
+                else:
+                    return conn.execute(sql, params or [])
 
         with trace(""sql"", database=self.name, sql=sql.strip(), params=params):
             results = await self.execute_write_fn(_inner, block=block)
```","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",1079149656,Optimize all those calls to index_list and foreign_key_list,
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1569#issuecomment-997249563,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1569,997249563,IC_kwDOBm6k_c47cNIb,9599,simonw,2021-12-18T18:21:23Z,2021-12-18T18:21:23Z,OWNER,"Goal here is to gain the ability to use `conn.executescript()` and still have it show up in the tracer.

https://docs.python.org/3/library/sqlite3.html#sqlite3.Cursor.executescript","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",1083895395,"db.execute_write(..., executescript=True) parameter",
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1555#issuecomment-997262475,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1555,997262475,IC_kwDOBm6k_c47cQSL,9599,simonw,2021-12-18T18:34:18Z,2021-12-18T18:34:18Z,OWNER,"<img width=""1055"" alt=""image"" src=""https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9599/146652142-1c0bc34e-4a18-407d-bd59-28d565b631a6.png"">

Using `executescript=True` that call now takes 1.89ms to create all of those tables.","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",1079149656,Optimize all those calls to index_list and foreign_key_list,
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1555#issuecomment-997266100,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1555,997266100,IC_kwDOBm6k_c47cRK0,9599,simonw,2021-12-18T18:40:02Z,2021-12-18T18:40:02Z,OWNER,The implementation of `cursor.executemany()` looks very efficient - it turns into a call to this C function with `multiple` set to `1`: https://github.com/python/cpython/blob/e002bbc6cce637171fb2b1391ffeca8643a13843/Modules/_sqlite/cursor.c#L468-L469,"{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",1079149656,Optimize all those calls to index_list and foreign_key_list,
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1569#issuecomment-997266687,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1569,997266687,IC_kwDOBm6k_c47cRT_,9599,simonw,2021-12-18T18:41:40Z,2021-12-18T18:41:40Z,OWNER,Updated documentation: https://docs.datasette.io/en/latest/internals.html#await-db-execute-write-sql-params-none-executescript-false-block-false,"{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",1083895395,"db.execute_write(..., executescript=True) parameter",
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1555#issuecomment-997267416,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1555,997267416,IC_kwDOBm6k_c47cRfY,9599,simonw,2021-12-18T18:44:53Z,2021-12-18T18:45:28Z,OWNER,"Rather than adding a `executemany=True` parameter, I'm now thinking a better design might be to have three methods:

- `db.execute_write(sql, params=None, block=False)`
- `db.execute_writescript(sql, block=False)`
- `db.execute_writemany(sql, params_seq, block=False)`","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",1079149656,Optimize all those calls to index_list and foreign_key_list,
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1570#issuecomment-997267583,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1570,997267583,IC_kwDOBm6k_c47cRh_,9599,simonw,2021-12-18T18:46:05Z,2021-12-18T18:46:12Z,OWNER,This will replace the work done in #1569.,"{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",1083921371,Separate db.execute_write() into three methods,
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1555#issuecomment-997272223,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1555,997272223,IC_kwDOBm6k_c47cSqf,9599,simonw,2021-12-18T19:17:13Z,2021-12-18T19:17:13Z,OWNER,That's a good optimization. Still need to deal with the huge flurry of `PRAGMA` queries though before I can consider this done.,"{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",1079149656,Optimize all those calls to index_list and foreign_key_list,
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1566#issuecomment-997272328,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1566,997272328,IC_kwDOBm6k_c47cSsI,9599,simonw,2021-12-18T19:18:01Z,2021-12-18T19:18:01Z,OWNER,"Added some useful new documented internal methods in:
- #1570","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",1083669410,Release Datasette 0.60,