html_url,issue_url,id,node_id,user,created_at,updated_at,author_association,body,reactions,issue,performed_via_github_app https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1882#issuecomment-1302715662,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1882,1302715662,IC_kwDOBm6k_c5Npd0O,9599,2022-11-03T21:50:27Z,2022-11-03T21:50:27Z,OWNER,"API design for this: ``` POST /db/-/create Authorization: Bearer xxx Content-Type: application/json { ""table"": { ""name"": ""my new table"", ""columns"": [ { ""name"": ""id"", ""type"": ""integer"" }, { ""name"": ""title"", ""type"": ""text"" } ] ""pk"": ""id"" } } ``` Supported column types are: - `integer` - `text` - `float` (even though SQLite calls it a ""real"") - `blob` This matches my design for `sqlite-utils`: https://sqlite-utils.datasette.io/en/stable/cli.html#cli-create-table","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",1435294468, https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1882#issuecomment-1302716350,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1882,1302716350,IC_kwDOBm6k_c5Npd--,9599,2022-11-03T21:51:14Z,2022-11-03T22:35:54Z,OWNER,"Validating this JSON object is getting a tiny bit complex. I'm tempted to adopt https://pydantic-docs.helpmanual.io/ at this point. The `create_model` example on https://stackoverflow.com/questions/66168517/generate-dynamic-model-using-pydantic/66168682#66168682 is particularly relevant, especially when I work on this issue: - #1863 ```python from pydantic import create_model d = {""strategy"": {""name"": ""test_strat2"", ""periods"": 10}} Strategy = create_model(""Strategy"", **d[""strategy""]) print(Strategy.schema_json(indent=2)) ``` `create_model()`: https://pydantic-docs.helpmanual.io/usage/models/#dynamic-model-creation","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",1435294468, https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1882#issuecomment-1302721916,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1882,1302721916,IC_kwDOBm6k_c5NpfV8,9599,2022-11-03T21:58:50Z,2022-11-03T21:59:17Z,OWNER,"Mocked up a quick HTML+JavaScript form for creating that JSON structure using some iteration against Copilot prompts: ```html
/* JSON format: { ""table"": { ""name"": ""my new table"", ""columns"": [ { ""name"": ""id"", ""type"": ""integer"" }, { ""name"": ""title"", ""type"": ""text"" } ] ""pk"": ""id"" } } HTML form with Javascript for creating this JSON: */```","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",1435294468, https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1882#issuecomment-1302818153,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1882,1302818153,IC_kwDOBm6k_c5Np21p,9599,2022-11-04T00:23:58Z,2022-11-04T00:23:58Z,OWNER,"I made a decision here that this endpoint should also accept an optional `""rows"": [...]` list which is used to automatically create the table using a schema derived from those example rows (which then get inserted): - https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1862#issuecomment-1302817807","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",1435294468, https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1882#issuecomment-1302818784,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1882,1302818784,IC_kwDOBm6k_c5Np2_g,9599,2022-11-04T00:25:18Z,2022-11-04T16:12:39Z,OWNER,"On that basis I think the core API design should change to this: ``` POST /db/-/create Authorization: Bearer xxx Content-Type: application/json { ""name"": ""my new table"", ""columns"": [ { ""name"": ""id"", ""type"": ""integer"" }, { ""name"": ""title"", ""type"": ""text"" } ] ""pk"": ""id"" } ``` This leaves room for a `""rows"": []` key at the root too. Having that as a child of `""table""` felt unintuitive to me, and I didn't like the way this looked either: ```json { ""table"": { ""name"": ""my_new_table"" }, ""rows"": [ {""id"": 1, ""title"": ""Title""} ] } ``` Weird to have the table `name` nested inside `table` when `rows` wasn't.","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",1435294468, https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1882#issuecomment-1312556044,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1882,1312556044,IC_kwDOBm6k_c5OPAQM,9599,2022-11-12T19:29:11Z,2022-11-12T19:29:11Z,OWNER,"Thought of an edge-case: with `sqlite-utils` one feature I really like is that I can pipe data into it without caring if the table already exists or not: cat data.json | sqlite-utils insert my.db mytable - How could this new API support that? I thought about adding a `""create"": true` option to `/db/table/-/insert` which creates the table if it doesn't already exist, but if I do that I'll need to start adding other options to that endpoint - to set the primary key, add foreign keys and suchlike - which would be ignored except for the cases where the table was being created from scratch. This doesn't feel right to me - I want to keep those options here, on `/db/-/create`. One idea I had was to implement it such that you can call `/db/-/create` multiple times for the same table, but only if you are using the `""rows""` option. If so, and if the rows can be safely inserted, it would let you do that. But instead, I'm going to outsource this to the CLI tool I plan to write that feeds data into this API. I'm already planning to use that tool for CSV inserts (so the API doesn't need to accept CSV directly). I think it's a good place for other usability enhancements like ""insert this, creating the table if it does not exist"" as well.","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",1435294468, https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1882#issuecomment-1312575048,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1882,1312575048,IC_kwDOBm6k_c5OPE5I,9599,2022-11-12T21:22:58Z,2022-11-12T21:22:58Z,OWNER,Need to validate the table name. SQLite supports almost any table name - but they can't contain a newline character and cannot start with `sqlite_` - according to https://stackoverflow.com/questions/3694276/what-are-valid-table-names-in-sqlite/43049720#43049720,"{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",1435294468, https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1882#issuecomment-1312580348,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1882,1312580348,IC_kwDOBm6k_c5OPGL8,9599,2022-11-12T21:55:54Z,2022-11-12T21:56:45Z,OWNER,"What should this API return? I think the name of the table (`name`), the URL to that table (`table_url` - for consistency with how faceting API works already) and the schema of the table (`schema`).","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",1435294468, https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1882#issuecomment-1312581008,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1882,1312581008,IC_kwDOBm6k_c5OPGWQ,9599,2022-11-12T22:00:52Z,2022-11-12T22:00:52Z,OWNER,"Tried out my prototype in the API explorer: The `""name""` on the output is bothering me a bit - should it be `table_name` or `table` instead? Problem is I really like `name` for the input, so should it be consistent to have the same name on the output here, or should I aim for consistency with other endpoints that might return `table` rather than the ambiguous `name` elsewhere?","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",1435294468, https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1882#issuecomment-1312581121,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1882,1312581121,IC_kwDOBm6k_c5OPGYB,9599,2022-11-12T22:01:32Z,2022-11-12T22:01:32Z,OWNER,I'm going to change it to `table` in the output AND the input.,"{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",1435294468, https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1882#issuecomment-1312582512,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1882,1312582512,IC_kwDOBm6k_c5OPGtw,9599,2022-11-12T22:11:18Z,2022-11-12T22:11:18Z,OWNER,"I like this: ```json { ""ok"": true, ""database"": ""data"", ""table"": ""agai2n"", ""table_url"": ""http://127.0.0.1:8001/data/agai2n"", ""schema"": ""CREATE TABLE [agai2n] (\n [hello] INTEGER\n)"" } ```","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",1435294468, https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1882#issuecomment-1314813205,https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1882,1314813205,IC_kwDOBm6k_c5OXnUV,9599,2022-11-15T06:00:41Z,2022-11-15T06:00:41Z,OWNER,"Documentation: - https://docs.datasette.io/en/1.0-dev/json_api.html#creating-a-table - https://docs.datasette.io/en/1.0-dev/json_api.html#creating-a-table-from-example-data Wrote a TIL about how I wrote some of those tests with Copilot: https://til.simonwillison.net/gpt3/writing-test-with-copilot","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",1435294468,