{"html_url": "https://github.com/dogsheep/healthkit-to-sqlite/issues/5#issuecomment-513625406", "issue_url": "https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/healthkit-to-sqlite/issues/5", "id": 513625406, "node_id": "MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDUxMzYyNTQwNg==", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "created_at": "2019-07-22T03:20:16Z", "updated_at": "2019-07-22T03:20:16Z", "author_association": "MEMBER", "body": "It now renders like this:\r\n```\r\nImporting from HealthKit  [#-----------------------------------]    5%  00:01:33\r\n```", "reactions": "{\"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "issue": {"value": 470691622, "label": "Add progress bar"}, "performed_via_github_app": null}
{"html_url": "https://github.com/dogsheep/healthkit-to-sqlite/issues/6#issuecomment-513626742", "issue_url": "https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/healthkit-to-sqlite/issues/6", "id": 513626742, "node_id": "MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDUxMzYyNjc0Mg==", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "created_at": "2019-07-22T03:28:55Z", "updated_at": "2019-07-22T03:28:55Z", "author_association": "MEMBER", "body": "Here's what it looks like now as separate tables:\r\n\r\n<img width=\"1050\" alt=\"hello9_and_Populate__endpoint__key_in_ASGI_scope_\u00b7_Issue__537_\u00b7_simonw_datasette\" src=\"https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9599/61604322-eba05000-abf5-11e9-8f8b-d0204e9a705a.png\">\r\n\r\n\r\n", "reactions": "{\"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "issue": {"value": 470856782, "label": "Break up records into different tables for each type"}, "performed_via_github_app": null}
{"html_url": "https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/537#issuecomment-513652597", "issue_url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/537", "id": 513652597, "node_id": "MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDUxMzY1MjU5Nw==", "user": {"value": 14834132, "label": "SteadBytes"}, "created_at": "2019-07-22T06:03:18Z", "updated_at": "2019-07-22T06:03:18Z", "author_association": "NONE", "body": "@simonw do you think it is still worth populating the `endpoint` key in the scope as originally intended by this issue, or should we hold off until a decision about possibly using an `X-Endpoint` header instead? :smile: ", "reactions": "{\"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "issue": {"value": 463544206, "label": "Populate \"endpoint\" key in ASGI scope"}, "performed_via_github_app": null}
{"html_url": "https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/3#issuecomment-513952182", "issue_url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/3", "id": 513952182, "node_id": "MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDUxMzk1MjE4Mg==", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "created_at": "2019-07-22T20:58:55Z", "updated_at": "2019-07-22T20:58:55Z", "author_association": "OWNER", "body": "Closing this as WONTFIX - it's not really an actionable ticket. I should still research these in the future though.", "reactions": "{\"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "issue": {"value": 351845423, "label": "Experiment with contentless FTS tables"}, "performed_via_github_app": null}