{"html_url": "https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/pull/146#issuecomment-688573964", "issue_url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/146", "id": 688573964, "node_id": "MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY4ODU3Mzk2NA==", "user": {"value": 96218, "label": "simonwiles"}, "created_at": "2020-09-08T01:55:07Z", "updated_at": "2020-09-08T01:55:07Z", "author_association": "CONTRIBUTOR", "body": "Okay, I've rewritten this PR to preserve the batching behaviour but still fix #145, and rebased the branch to account for the `db.execute()` api change.  It's not terribly sophisticated -- if it attempts to insert a batch which has too many variables, the exception is caught, the batch is split in two and each half is inserted separately, and then it carries on as before with the same `batch_size`.  In the edge case where this gets triggered, subsequent batches will all be inserted in two groups too if they continue to have the same number of columns (which is presumably reasonably likely).  Do you reckon this is acceptable when set against the awkwardness of recalculating the `batch_size` on the fly?", "reactions": "{\"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "issue": {"value": 688668680, "label": "Handle case where subsequent records (after first batch) include extra columns"}, "performed_via_github_app": null}