{"html_url": "https://github.com/dogsheep/dogsheep-photos/issues/8#issuecomment-618100434", "issue_url": "https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/dogsheep-photos/issues/8", "id": 618100434, "node_id": "MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDYxODEwMDQzNA==", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "created_at": "2020-04-23T00:02:53Z", "updated_at": "2020-04-23T00:02:53Z", "author_association": "MEMBER", "body": "I don't think it matters one way or the other - I'm storing the sha256 in the filename, so the fact that I could read the MD5 back from the list bucket operation doesn't give me any benefits.", "reactions": "{\"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "issue": {"value": 605147638, "label": "Should I have used MD5 instead of SHA256?"}, "performed_via_github_app": null}
{"html_url": "https://github.com/dogsheep/dogsheep-photos/issues/8#issuecomment-618100658", "issue_url": "https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/dogsheep-photos/issues/8", "id": 618100658, "node_id": "MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDYxODEwMDY1OA==", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "created_at": "2020-04-23T00:03:35Z", "updated_at": "2020-04-23T00:03:35Z", "author_association": "MEMBER", "body": "Also MD5 isn't guaranteed for the ETag:\r\n> If an object is created by either the Multipart Upload or Part Copy operation, the ETag is not an MD5 digest, regardless of the method of encryption.\r\n", "reactions": "{\"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "issue": {"value": 605147638, "label": "Should I have used MD5 instead of SHA256?"}, "performed_via_github_app": null}
{"html_url": "https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/731#issuecomment-618126449", "issue_url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/731", "id": 618126449, "node_id": "MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDYxODEyNjQ0OQ==", "user": {"value": 25778, "label": "eyeseast"}, "created_at": "2020-04-23T01:38:55Z", "updated_at": "2020-04-23T01:38:55Z", "author_association": "CONTRIBUTOR", "body": "I've almost suggested this same thing a couple times. I tend to have Makefile (because I'm doing other `make` stuff anyway to get data prepped), and I end up putting all those CLI options in something like `make run`. But it would be way easier to just have all those typical options -- plugins, templates, metadata -- be defaults.", "reactions": "{\"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "issue": {"value": 605110015, "label": "Option to automatically configure based on directory layout"}, "performed_via_github_app": null}
{"html_url": "https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/731#issuecomment-618155472", "issue_url": "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/731", "id": 618155472, "node_id": "MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDYxODE1NTQ3Mg==", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "created_at": "2020-04-23T03:28:42Z", "updated_at": "2020-04-23T03:28:56Z", "author_association": "OWNER", "body": "As an alternative to `--static` this could work by letting you create the following:\r\n\r\n- `static/css/`\r\n- `static/js/`\r\n\r\nWhich would be automatically mounted at `/js/...` and `/css/...`\r\n\r\nOr maybe just mount `static/` at `/static/` instead? ", "reactions": "{\"total_count\": 1, \"+1\": 1, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "issue": {"value": 605110015, "label": "Option to automatically configure based on directory layout"}, "performed_via_github_app": null}
{"html_url": "https://github.com/dogsheep/dogsheep-photos/issues/9#issuecomment-618724149", "issue_url": "https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/dogsheep-photos/issues/9", "id": 618724149, "node_id": "MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDYxODcyNDE0OQ==", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "created_at": "2020-04-23T23:35:29Z", "updated_at": "2020-04-23T23:35:29Z", "author_association": "MEMBER", "body": "```\r\n% photos-to-sqlite upload photos.db ~/Pictures/Photos\\ Library.photoslibrary/originals\r\nFetching existing keys from S3...\r\nGot 22,446 existing keys\r\nCalculating hashes  [####--------------------------------]   13%  00:04:14\r\n```", "reactions": "{\"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "issue": {"value": 605938063, "label": "upload command should be resumable, should only upload photos not already uploaded"}, "performed_via_github_app": null}
{"html_url": "https://github.com/dogsheep/dogsheep-photos/issues/9#issuecomment-618725155", "issue_url": "https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/dogsheep-photos/issues/9", "id": 618725155, "node_id": "MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDYxODcyNTE1NQ==", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "created_at": "2020-04-23T23:39:14Z", "updated_at": "2020-04-23T23:39:14Z", "author_association": "MEMBER", "body": "A few minutes later...\r\n```\r\nFetching existing keys from S3...\r\nGot 22,446 existing keys\r\nCalculating hashes  [####################################]  100%          \r\n22,441 hashed files, 610 are not yet in S3\r\nUploading 0.99 GB\r\nUploading 610 photos  [------------------------------------]  1/610  03:10:35\r\n```", "reactions": "{\"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "issue": {"value": 605938063, "label": "upload command should be resumable, should only upload photos not already uploaded"}, "performed_via_github_app": null}