issue_comments: 1030871591
This data as json
| html_url | issue_url | id | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | issue | performed_via_github_app |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/399#issuecomment-1030871591 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/399 | 1030871591 | IC_kwDOCGYnMM49cdon | 9599 | 2022-02-06T16:57:22Z | 2022-02-06T16:57:22Z | OWNER | I wonder if I could implement the above such that this *also* works: ```python db["places"].insert( { "name": "London", "point": LongitudeLatitude(-0.118092, 51.509865) } ) ``` This feels like a very natural way to work with single inserts. The challenge is writing the code inside `.insert_all()` such that it can handle these special objects in the input column values in addition to them being passed in `conversions=`. I'm feeling very good about this direction in general though, it feels like it takes the existing but not particularly elegant `conversions=` mechanism and upgrades it to be far more useful, while maintaining backwards compatibility. | {"total_count": 1, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 1} | 1124731464 |