issue_comments: 1092321966
This data as json
| html_url | issue_url | id | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | issue | performed_via_github_app |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1699#issuecomment-1092321966 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1699 | 1092321966 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5BG4Ku | 9599 | 2022-04-08T00:20:32Z | 2022-04-08T00:20:56Z | OWNER | If we do this I'm keen to have it be more than just an alternative to the existing `sqlite-utils` command - especially since if I add `sqlite-utils` as a dependency of Datasette in the future that command will be installed as part of `pip install datasette` anyway. My best thought on how to differentiate them so far is plugins: if Datasette plugins that provide alternative outputs - like `.geojson` and `.yml` and suchlike - also work for the `datasette query` command that would make a lot of sense to me. One way that could work: a `--fmt geojson` option to this command which uses the plugin that was registered for the specified extension. | {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | 1193090967 |