issue_comments: 1259718517
This data as json
| html_url | issue_url | id | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | issue | performed_via_github_app |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/526#issuecomment-1259718517 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/526 | 1259718517 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5LFcd1 | 536941 | 2022-09-27T16:02:51Z | 2022-09-27T16:04:46Z | CONTRIBUTOR | i think that `max_returned_rows` **is** a defense mechanism, just not for connection exhaustion. `max_returned_rows` is a defense mechanism against **memory bombs**. if you are potentially yielding out hundreds of thousands or even millions of rows, you need to be quite careful about data flow to not run out of memory on the server, or on the client. you have a lot of places in your code that are protective of that right now, but `max_returned_rows` acts as the final backstop. so, given that, it makes sense to have removing `max_returned_rows` altogether be a non-goal, but instead allow for for specific codepaths (like streaming csv's) be able to bypass. that could dramatically lower the surface area for a memory-bomb attack. | {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | 459882902 |