issue_comments: 1267708232
This data as json
| html_url | issue_url | id | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | issue | performed_via_github_app |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1829#issuecomment-1267708232 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1829 | 1267708232 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5Lj7FI | 9599 | 2022-10-04T23:17:36Z | 2022-10-04T23:17:36Z | OWNER | Here's the relevant code from the table page: https://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/4218c9cd742b79b1e3cb80878e42b7e39d16ded2/datasette/views/table.py#L215-L227 Note how `ensure_permissions()` there takes the table, database and instance into account... but the `private` assignment (used to decide if the padlock should display or not) only considers the `view-table` check. Here's the same code for the database page: https://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/4218c9cd742b79b1e3cb80878e42b7e39d16ded2/datasette/views/database.py#L139-L141 And for canned query pages: https://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/4218c9cd742b79b1e3cb80878e42b7e39d16ded2/datasette/views/database.py#L228-L240 | {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | 1396948693 |