issue_comments: 1267709546
This data as json
| html_url | issue_url | id | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | issue | performed_via_github_app |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1829#issuecomment-1267709546 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1829 | 1267709546 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5Lj7Zq | 9599 | 2022-10-04T23:19:24Z | 2022-10-04T23:21:07Z | OWNER | There's also a `check_visibility()` helper which I'm not using in these particular cases but which may be relevant. It's called like this: https://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/4218c9cd742b79b1e3cb80878e42b7e39d16ded2/datasette/views/database.py#L65-L77 And is defined here: https://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/4218c9cd742b79b1e3cb80878e42b7e39d16ded2/datasette/app.py#L694-L710 It's actually documented as a public method here: https://docs.datasette.io/en/stable/internals.html#await-check-visibility-actor-action-resource-none > This convenience method can be used to answer the question "should this item be considered private, in that it is visible to me but it is not visible to anonymous users?" > > It returns a tuple of two booleans, `(visible, private)`. `visible` indicates if the actor can see this resource. `private` will be `True` if an anonymous user would not be able to view the resource. Note that this documented method cannot actually do the right thing - because it's not being given the multiple permissions that need to be checked in order to completely answer the question. So I probably need to redesign that method a bit. | {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | 1396948693 |