issue_comments: 1271004167
This data as json
| html_url | issue_url | id | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | issue | performed_via_github_app |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1836#issuecomment-1271004167 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1836 | 1271004167 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5LwfwH | 9599 | 2022-10-07T01:53:05Z | 2022-10-07T01:53:05Z | OWNER | Oh this is interesting! Is your hunch here that running this line is causing the file to be stored as a second layer? https://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/5aa359b86907d11b3ee601510775a85a90224da8/datasette/utils/__init__.py#L399 I guess it's possible that running a non-read-only query against the database causes one or two bytes to be changed (maybe a transaction ID or similar?) Modifying the `inspect` command to use `?mode=ro` seems sensible to me. Except.... it should already be opening those files in immutable mode according to this line: https://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/eff112498ecc499323c26612d707908831446d25/datasette/cli.py#L172-L173 Here's what opening as a `immutables` does: https://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/eff112498ecc499323c26612d707908831446d25/datasette/app.py#L258-L260 https://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/eff112498ecc499323c26612d707908831446d25/datasette/database.py#L98 | {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | 1400374908 |