issue_comments: 1295660092
This data as json
| html_url | issue_url | id | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | issue | performed_via_github_app |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| https://github.com/simonw/datasette/pull/1870#issuecomment-1295660092 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1870 | 1295660092 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5NOjQ8 | 9599 | 2022-10-29T00:25:26Z | 2022-10-29T00:25:26Z | OWNER | Saw your comment here too: https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1480#issuecomment-1271101072 > switching from `immutable=1` to `mode=ro` completely addressed this. see https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1836#issuecomment-1271100651 for details. So maybe we need a special case for containers that are intended to be run using Docker - the ones produced by `datasette package` and `datasette publish cloudrun`? Those are cases where the `-i` option should actually be opened in read-only mode, not immutable mode. Maybe a `datasette serve --irw data.db` option for opening a file in immutable-but-actually-read-only mode? Bit ugly though. I should run some benchmarks to figure out if `immutable` really does offer significant performance benefits. | {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | 1426379903 |