issue_comments: 1530822437
This data as json
| html_url | issue_url | id | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | issue | performed_via_github_app |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| https://github.com/simonw/datasette/pull/2052#issuecomment-1530822437 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/2052 | 1530822437 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5bPn8l | 193185 | 2023-05-02T03:35:30Z | 2023-05-02T16:02:38Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Also, just checking - is this how I'd write bulletproof plugin registration code that is robust against the order in which the script tags load (eg if both my code and the Datasette code are loaded via a `<script async src='...'/>` tag)? ```js if (window.__DATASETTE__) go(window.__DATASETTE__); else document.addEventListener("datasette_init", (evt) => go(evt.detail)); function go(manager) { manager.registerPlugin(...) } ``` I don't know if it'd make sense, but you could also consider the asynchronous queuing pattern that Google Analytics uses (see [this Stack Overflow post](https://stackoverflow.com/questions/6963779/whats-the-name-of-google-analytics-async-design-pattern-and-where-is-it-used) for more details): ```js __DATASETTE__ = __DATASETTE__ || []; __DATASETTE__.push(go); function go(manager) { manager.registerPlugin(...); } ``` | {"total_count": 2, "+1": 1, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 1} | 1651082214 |