issue_comments: 1683398866
This data as json
| html_url | issue_url | id | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | issue | performed_via_github_app |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/586#issuecomment-1683398866 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/586 | 1683398866 | IC_kwDOCGYnMM5kVqDS | 9599 | 2023-08-18T06:05:50Z | 2023-08-18T06:06:42Z | OWNER | Options: - Provide a `recreate_views: bool` parameter to `table.transform()` controlling if views that might reference this table are stashed and dropped and recreated within a transaction as part of the operation. But should that be `True` or `False` by default? - Read that `PRAGMA` and automatically do that view workaround if it's turned on - Toggle that `PRAGMA` off for the duration of the `.transform()` operation and on again at the end. Does it only affect the current connection? - Try the `transform()` in a transaction, detect the `"error in view"`, `"no such table"`error, if spotted then do the VIEW workaround and try again I'm on the fence as to which of these I like the most. I'm tempted to go with the one which just drops VIEWS and recreates them all the time, because it feels simpler. | {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | 1856075668 |