issue_comments: 393106520
This data as json
| html_url | issue_url | id | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | issue | performed_via_github_app |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/276#issuecomment-393106520 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/276 | 393106520 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM5MzEwNjUyMA== | 45057 | 2018-05-30T10:09:25Z | 2018-05-30T10:09:25Z | CONTRIBUTOR | I don't think it's unreasonable to only support spatialite geometries in a coordinate reference system which is at least transformable to WGS84. It would be nice to support different CRSes in the database so conversion to spatialite from the source data is lossless. I think the working CRS for datasette should be WGS84 though (leaflet requires it, for example) - it's just a case of calling `ST_Transform(geom, 4326)` on the column while we're loading the data. | {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | 324835838 |