issue_comments: 405026800
This data as json
| html_url | issue_url | id | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | issue | performed_via_github_app |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/294#issuecomment-405026800 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/294 | 405026800 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQwNTAyNjgwMA== | 45057 | 2018-07-14T14:24:31Z | 2018-07-14T14:24:31Z | CONTRIBUTOR | I had a quick look at this in relation to #343 and I feel like it might be worth modelling the inspected table metadata internally as an object rather than a dict. (We'd still have to serialise it back to JSON.) There are a few places where we rely on the structure of this metadata dict for various reasons, including in templates (and potentially also in user templates). It would be nice to have a reasonably well defined API for accessing metadata internally so that it's clearer what we're breaking. | {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | 327365110 |