issue_comments: 481940539
This data as json
| html_url | issue_url | id | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | issue | performed_via_github_app |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/427#issuecomment-481940539 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/427 | 481940539 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ4MTk0MDUzOQ== | 9599 | 2019-04-11T02:26:43Z | 2019-04-11T02:26:43Z | OWNER | I quite like the Solr idea. It could look like this for Datasette: `?_facet=name` - default behaviour, same as today. But that's actually an alias for `?_facet.name=name` - which defines a name for the facet. `?_facet.tags.array=tags` - would define a facet called `tags` that uses an array facet against the `tags` column. I don't like the need to say `tags` twice in that though. | {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | 431800286 |