issue_comments: 496338533
This data as json
| html_url | issue_url | id | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | issue | performed_via_github_app |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/473#issuecomment-496338533 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/473 | 496338533 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ5NjMzODUzMw== | 9599 | 2019-05-28T02:05:39Z | 2019-05-28T02:05:39Z | OWNER | I wonder if this is the right hook? The more likely case is that we need a hook that registers a new type of lookup entirely - `?_spatial_within={geojson}` for example. These aren't necessarily attached to a specific column and may have entirely custom syntax - but they still need to be able to influence the query (like the `_where=` clause does) and the human-readable description of the page. Is there a strong case for supporting both custom filter plugins AND custom table where plugins, or could those where plugins cover both bases? | {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | 445850934 |