issue_comments: 552251831
This data as json
| html_url | issue_url | id | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | issue | performed_via_github_app |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/620#issuecomment-552251831 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/620 | 552251831 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDU1MjI1MTgzMQ== | 9599 | 2019-11-11T00:25:58Z | 2019-11-11T00:25:58Z | OWNER | There are three pieces of information that need to be described here: the column, the other table and the other table column. We already have a piece of API design that is similar to this: the `_through=` parameter, which looks like this: `?_through={"table":"m2m_characteristics","column":"characteristic_id","value":"1"}` I'm rethinking this syntax in #621 though to support a non-JSON variant that looks more like this: `?_through.roadside_attraction_characteristics.characteristic_id=1` | {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | 520667773 |