issue_comments: 592621235
This data as json
| html_url | issue_url | id | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | issue | performed_via_github_app |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/581#issuecomment-592621235 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/581 | 592621235 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDU5MjYyMTIzNQ== | 9599 | 2020-02-28T17:24:06Z | 2020-05-27T21:12:21Z | OWNER | Rather than pass a request object (hence promoting that object into part of the documented, stable API) I think I'll pass the ASGI scope - that's already a stable, documented standard. UPDATE: changed my mind since `request` is used by other plugins too, see #706. | {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | 502993509 |