issue_comments: 607011421
This data as json
| html_url | issue_url | id | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | issue | performed_via_github_app |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| https://github.com/dogsheep/twitter-to-sqlite/issues/40#issuecomment-607011421 | https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/twitter-to-sqlite/issues/40 | 607011421 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDYwNzAxMTQyMQ== | 9599 | 2020-04-01T03:47:37Z | 2020-04-01T03:55:08Z | MEMBER | Actually a single table with a `type` integer ID referencing a `count_history_types` table would better match the way I implemented the `since_ids` table: https://github.com/dogsheep/twitter-to-sqlite/blob/4b6c8d8c1cc6fefdb566ec8506157133f47c569a/twitter_to_sqlite/utils.py#L331-L341 In which case the compound primary key would be `type`, `user`, `datetime` | {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | 590669793 |