issue_comments: 640367128
This data as json
| html_url | issue_url | id | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | issue | performed_via_github_app |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/811#issuecomment-640367128 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/811 | 640367128 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY0MDM2NzEyOA== | 9599 | 2020-06-08T05:00:13Z | 2020-06-08T05:00:49Z | OWNER | Should the padlock show up on tables that are private only because they inherited their privacy from their parent database or even the parent instance? Interesting question. If an instance is private, I'm not sure it makes sense to show padlocks on absolutely everything. Likewise, a list of tables shown on the database table with a padlock next to every single table (when the database itself is private) doesn't seem to add any useful information. I think "Show 🔒 in header on private database page" will resolve this for me. I'll always show the padlock in the header of a database/table page even if that privacy is inherited - but I won't do that for padlocks shown in the list of tables or list of databases. | {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | 633578769 |