issue_comments: 689226390
This data as json
| html_url | issue_url | id | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | issue | performed_via_github_app |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| https://github.com/dogsheep/dogsheep-beta/issues/17#issuecomment-689226390 | https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/dogsheep-beta/issues/17 | 689226390 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY4OTIyNjM5MA== | 9599 | 2020-09-09T00:36:07Z | 2020-09-09T00:36:07Z | MEMBER | Alternative names: - type - record_type - doctype I think `type` is right. It matches what Elasticsearch used to call their equivalent of this (before they removed the feature!). https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/elasticsearch/reference/current/removal-of-types.html | {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | 694500679 |