issue_comments: 705916614
This data as json
| html_url | issue_url | id | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | issue | performed_via_github_app |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1001#issuecomment-705916614 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1001 | 705916614 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDcwNTkxNjYxNA== | 9599 | 2020-10-09T01:37:06Z | 2020-10-09T01:37:06Z | OWNER | I'm tempted to imitate Django Rest Framework here: https://github.com/encode/django-rest-framework/blob/2e721cdbc85a924d0b0f093b86fe1497b58fe287/rest_framework/views.py#L514-L521 ```python def options(self, request, *args, **kwargs): """ Handler method for HTTP 'OPTIONS' request. """ if self.metadata_class is None: return self.http_method_not_allowed(request, *args, **kwargs) data = self.metadata_class().determine_metadata(request, self) return Response(data, status=status.HTTP_200_OK) ``` That `determine_metadata()` default method does this: https://github.com/encode/django-rest-framework/blob/335054a5d36b352a58286b303b608b6bf48152f8/rest_framework/metadata.py#L29 Note the comment at the top: ``` There are not any formalized standards for `OPTIONS` responses for us to base this on. ``` | {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | 717768441 |