issue_comments: 771975941
This data as json
| html_url | issue_url | id | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | issue | performed_via_github_app |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1212#issuecomment-771975941 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1212 | 771975941 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc3MTk3NTk0MQ== | 9599 | 2021-02-02T20:52:36Z | 2021-02-02T20:52:36Z | OWNER | 37 minutes, wow! They're a little slow for me (4-5 minutes perhaps) but not nearly that bad. Thanks for running that profile. I think you're right: figuring out how to use more session scopes would definitely help. The `:memory:` idea is interesting too. The new `memory_name=` feature added in #1151 (released in Datasette 0.54) could help a lot here, since it allows Datasette instances to share the same in-memory database across multiple HTTP requests and connections. Note that `memory_name=` also persists within test runs themselves, independently of any `scope=` options on the fixtures. That might actually help us here! I'd be delighted if you explored this issue further, especially the option of using `memory_name=` for the fixtures databases used by the tests. | {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | 797651831 |