issue_comments: 894929769
This data as json
| html_url | issue_url | id | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | issue | performed_via_github_app |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1421#issuecomment-894929769 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1421 | 894929769 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c41V4tp | 9599 | 2021-08-09T03:36:49Z | 2021-08-09T03:36:49Z | OWNER | SQLite carries a warning about using `EXPLAIN` like this: https://www.sqlite.org/lang_explain.html > The output from EXPLAIN and EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN is intended for interactive analysis and troubleshooting only. The details of the output format are subject to change from one release of SQLite to the next. Applications should not use EXPLAIN or EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN since their exact behavior is variable and only partially documented. I think that's OK here, because of the regular expression fallback. If the format changes in the future in a way that breaks the query the error should be caught and the regex-captured parameters should be returned instead. Hmmm... actually that's not entirely true: https://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/b1fed48a95516ae84c0f020582303ab50ab817e2/datasette/utils/__init__.py#L1084-L1091 If the format changes such that the same columns are returned but the `[row["p4"].lstrip(":") for row in results if row["opcode"] == "Variable"]` list comprehension returns an empty array it will break Datasette! I'm going to take that risk for the moment, but I'll actively watch out for problems in the future. If this does turn out to be bad I can always go back to the pure regular expression mechanism. | {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | 959999095 |