issue_comments: 996046304
This data as json
| html_url | issue_url | id | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | issue | performed_via_github_app |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1552#issuecomment-996046304 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1552 | 996046304 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c47XnXg | 9599 | 2021-12-16T17:53:40Z | 2021-12-16T18:16:12Z | OWNER | I'm also not convinced that this configuration syntax is right. It's a bit weird having a `"facets"` list that can either by column-name-strings or `{"type-of-facet": "column-name"}` objects. Maybe there's a better design for this? Part of the problem here is that facets were designed to accept optional extra configuration - partly to support `m2m` facets in #495 - but I haven't actually shipped any facets that use that ability. Facet by delimiter would be a good one to exercise that ability: - #510 | {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | 1078702875 |