issue_comments
3 rows where author_association = "CONTRIBUTOR" and "updated_at" is on date 2023-06-29 sorted by id descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: issue_url, created_at (date)
id ▲ | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | issue | performed_via_github_app |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1613896210 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/2093#issuecomment-1613896210 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/2093 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5gMhoS | asg017 15178711 | 2023-06-29T22:53:33Z | 2023-06-29T22:53:33Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Maybe we can have a separate issue for revamping `metadata.json`? A `datasette_metadata` table or the `sqlite-docs` extension seem like two reasonable additions that we can work through. Storing metadata inside a SQLite database makes sense, but I don't think storing `datasette.*` style config (ex ports, settings, etc.) inside a SQLite DB makes sense, since it's very environment-dependent | {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | Proposal: Combine settings, metadata, static, etc. into a single `datasette.toml` File 1781530343 | |
1613895188 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/2093#issuecomment-1613895188 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/2093 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5gMhYU | asg017 15178711 | 2023-06-29T22:51:53Z | 2023-06-29T22:51:53Z | CONTRIBUTOR | I agree with not liking `metadata.json` stuff in a `datasette.*` config file. Editing description of a table/column in a file like `datasette.*` seems odd to me. Though since plugin configuration currently lives in `metadata.json`, I think it should be removed from there and placed in `datasette.*`, at least for top-level config like `datasette-auth-github`'s config. Keeping `metadata.json` strictly for documentation/licensing/column units makes sense to me, but anything plugin related should be in some config file, like `datasette.*`. And ya, supporting both `datasette.*` and CLI flags makes a lot of sense to me. Any `--setting` flag should override anything in `datasette.*` for easier debugging, with possibly a warning message so people don't get confused. Same with `--port` and a port defined in `datasette.*` | {"total_count": 1, "+1": 1, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | Proposal: Combine settings, metadata, static, etc. into a single `datasette.toml` File 1781530343 | |
1613778296 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/pull/2052#issuecomment-1613778296 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/2052 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5gME14 | asg017 15178711 | 2023-06-29T20:36:09Z | 2023-06-29T20:36:09Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Ok @hydrosquall a couple things before this PR should be good to go: - Can we move `datasette/static/table-example-plugins.js` into `demos/plugins/static`? - For `datasetteManager.VERSION`, can we fill that in or just comment it out for now? Not sure how difficult it'll be to inject it server-side. I imagine we could also have a small build process with esbuild/rollup that just injects a version string into `manager.js` directly, so we don't have to worry about server-rendering (but that can be a future PR) In terms of how to integrate this into Datasette, a few options I can see working: - Push this as-is and figure it out before the next release - Hide this feature behind a settings flag (`--setting unstable-js-plugins on`) and use that setting to hide/show `<script src="{{ urls.static('datasette-manager.js') }}" defer></script>` in `base.html` I'll let @simonw decide which one to work with. I kindof like the idea of having an "unstable" opt-in process to enable JS plugins, to give us time to try it out with a wide variety of plugins until we feel its ready. I'm also curious to see how "plugins for a plugin' would work, like #1542. For example, if the leaflet plugin showed default markers, but also included its own hook for other plugins to add more markers/styling. I'm imagine that the individual plugin would re-create their own plugin system compared to this, since handling "plugins of plugins" at the top with Datasette seems really convoluted. Also for posterity, here's a list of Simon's Datasette plugins that use "extra_js_urls()", which probably means they can be ported/re-written to use this new plugin system: - [`datasette-vega`](https://github.com/simonw/datasette-vega/blob/00de059ab1ef77394ba9f9547abfacf966c479c4/datasette_vega/__init__.py#L25) - [`datasette-cluster-map`](https://github.com/simonw/datasette-cluster-map/blob/795d25ad9ff6cba0307191f44fecc8f8070bef5c/datasette_cluster_map/__init__.py#L14) - [`datasette-leaflet-geojson`](https://github.com/simonw/datasette-leaflet… | {"total_count": 1, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 1} | feat: Javascript Plugin API (Custom panels, column menu items with JS actions) 1651082214 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) , [performed_via_github_app] TEXT); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
updated_at (date) 1 ✖