issue_comments
33 rows where "updated_at" is on date 2020-06-08
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: issue
reactions 1 ✖
created_at (date) 1 ✖
- 2020-06-08 33
id ▼ | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | issue | performed_via_github_app |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
640337951 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/811#issuecomment-640337951 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/811 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY0MDMzNzk1MQ== | simonw 9599 | 2020-06-08T03:11:58Z | 2020-06-08T03:11:58Z | OWNER | I'd like to be able to apply permissions for the ability to run a SQL query - but I'm not sure where the best place for that `"allow"` block to live would be. | {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | Support "allow" block on root, databases and tables, not just queries 633578769 | |
640338151 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/811#issuecomment-640338151 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/811 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY0MDMzODE1MQ== | simonw 9599 | 2020-06-08T03:12:41Z | 2020-06-08T03:12:41Z | OWNER | Also need to expand the docs on https://datasette.readthedocs.io/en/latest/authentication.html to explain where you can put `allow` blocks to control access to the instance, database or table. | {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | Support "allow" block on root, databases and tables, not just queries 633578769 | |
640338347 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/811#issuecomment-640338347 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/811 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY0MDMzODM0Nw== | simonw 9599 | 2020-06-08T03:13:23Z | 2020-06-08T03:13:23Z | OWNER | Do row-level permissions even make sense? Might be a good idea to remove those until I have a good use-case for them. | {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | Support "allow" block on root, databases and tables, not just queries 633578769 | |
640339117 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/801#issuecomment-640339117 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/801 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY0MDMzOTExNw== | simonw 9599 | 2020-06-08T03:16:16Z | 2020-06-08T03:16:16Z | OWNER | I'm going to call this key `"allow_by_query"` - I think I need `allow_sql` for something else (for configuring if users are allowed to execute arbitrary SQL queries). | {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | allow_by_query setting for configuring permissions with a SQL statement 631932926 | |
640339674 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/811#issuecomment-640339674 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/811 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY0MDMzOTY3NA== | simonw 9599 | 2020-06-08T03:18:15Z | 2020-06-08T03:18:15Z | OWNER | I should take these permissions into account when displaying a list of tables or a list of databases (like I do right now when displaying a list of queries). | {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | Support "allow" block on root, databases and tables, not just queries 633578769 | |
640339828 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/801#issuecomment-640339828 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/801 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY0MDMzOTgyOA== | simonw 9599 | 2020-06-08T03:18:47Z | 2020-06-08T03:18:47Z | OWNER | Example. This will only allow users to access the `fixtures` database if the logged-in actor's ID value appears for a record in the `users` table which has `admin` = 1. ```json { "databases": { "fixtures": { "allow_by_query": "select * from users where id = :id and admin = 1" } } } ``` | {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | allow_by_query setting for configuring permissions with a SQL statement 631932926 | |
640344950 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/811#issuecomment-640344950 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/811 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY0MDM0NDk1MA== | simonw 9599 | 2020-06-08T03:36:49Z | 2020-06-08T03:36:49Z | OWNER | Oh this is a bit awkward - should I be running per-table permission checks for every table that might be shown on the index page? <img width="841" alt="Datasette__fixtures__data" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9599/83990459-9862e900-a8fe-11ea-8a42-60cc3d6f7693.png"> | {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | Support "allow" block on root, databases and tables, not just queries 633578769 | |
640345115 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/811#issuecomment-640345115 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/811 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY0MDM0NTExNQ== | simonw 9599 | 2020-06-08T03:37:33Z | 2020-06-08T03:37:33Z | OWNER | Per-table permissions is pretty interesting for large installations though - an organization might have hundreds of CSV files imported into Datasette and then allow users to specify which exact users within that organization are allowed to see which CSV. | {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | Support "allow" block on root, databases and tables, not just queries 633578769 | |
640348785 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/811#issuecomment-640348785 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/811 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY0MDM0ODc4NQ== | simonw 9599 | 2020-06-08T03:51:50Z | 2020-06-08T03:51:50Z | OWNER | New convention: the 🔒 icon is now shown next to resources that are private - that are visible to you now, but would not be visible to the anonymous user. <img width="823" alt="Datasette__fixtures__data" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9599/83991127-b3cef380-a900-11ea-9df3-8fcd4c10cc42.png"> | {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | Support "allow" block on root, databases and tables, not just queries 633578769 | |
640362879 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/811#issuecomment-640362879 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/811 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY0MDM2Mjg3OQ== | simonw 9599 | 2020-06-08T04:42:28Z | 2020-06-08T13:39:46Z | OWNER | I'm finding myself repeating this pattern a lot: ```python for table in table_counts: allowed = await self.ds.permission_allowed( request.scope.get("actor"), "view-table", resource_type="table", resource_identifier=(database, table), default=True, ) if not allowed: continue private = not await self.ds.permission_allowed( None, "view-table", resource_type="table", resource_identifier=(database, table), ) ``` I use a similar pattern for lists of databases and lists of queries, and I'll be doing the same thing for lists of SQL views too. An abstraction around this would be useful. Idea: ```python visible, private = await check_visibility( self.ds, actor, "view-table", "table", (database, table) ) ``` | {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | Support "allow" block on root, databases and tables, not just queries 633578769 | |
640365512 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/811#issuecomment-640365512 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/811 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY0MDM2NTUxMg== | simonw 9599 | 2020-06-08T04:53:49Z | 2020-06-08T04:53:49Z | OWNER | I really like the padlocks. I should include a screenshot in the documentation that illustrates them. <img width="620" alt="data" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9599/83993771-483d5400-a909-11ea-8e7b-85b54e40f900.png"> Maybe I should figure out a way to have the https://latest.datasette.io/ demo illustrate both a logged-in and a logged-out state. | {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | Support "allow" block on root, databases and tables, not just queries 633578769 | |
640367128 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/811#issuecomment-640367128 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/811 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY0MDM2NzEyOA== | simonw 9599 | 2020-06-08T05:00:13Z | 2020-06-08T05:00:49Z | OWNER | Should the padlock show up on tables that are private only because they inherited their privacy from their parent database or even the parent instance? Interesting question. If an instance is private, I'm not sure it makes sense to show padlocks on absolutely everything. Likewise, a list of tables shown on the database table with a padlock next to every single table (when the database itself is private) doesn't seem to add any useful information. I think "Show 🔒 in header on private database page" will resolve this for me. I'll always show the padlock in the header of a database/table page even if that privacy is inherited - but I won't do that for padlocks shown in the list of tables or list of databases. | {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | Support "allow" block on root, databases and tables, not just queries 633578769 | |
640638057 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/814#issuecomment-640638057 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/814 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY0MDYzODA1Nw== | simonw 9599 | 2020-06-08T14:11:51Z | 2020-06-08T14:12:12Z | OWNER | The only impact it has at all is on this code here: https://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/cc218fa9be55842656d030545c308392e3736053/datasette/views/base.py#L515-L527 That `ds.cache_headers` property looks like it needs rethinking too. | {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | Remove --debug option from datasette serve 634651079 | |
640656143 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/815#issuecomment-640656143 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/815 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY0MDY1NjE0Mw== | simonw 9599 | 2020-06-08T14:25:48Z | 2020-06-08T14:26:45Z | OWNER | Will we need a request correlation ID for this? Multiple asyncio threads can write things to the `ds._permission_checks` deque at the same time. | {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | Group permission checks by request on /-/permissions debug page 634663505 | |
640671241 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/815#issuecomment-640671241 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/815 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY0MDY3MTI0MQ== | simonw 9599 | 2020-06-08T14:38:04Z | 2020-06-08T14:38:04Z | OWNER | Alternative to a correlation ID would be to use the existing `AsgiTracer` / `capture_traces` mechanism. That's probably smarter. It could even start logging SQL queries to an in-memory deque too, so a debug tool could show you queries executed by other requests! | {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | Group permission checks by request on /-/permissions debug page 634663505 | |
640671398 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/815#issuecomment-640671398 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/815 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY0MDY3MTM5OA== | simonw 9599 | 2020-06-08T14:38:20Z | 2020-06-08T14:38:20Z | OWNER | But `ds._permission_checks` is also used for unit tests. | {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | Group permission checks by request on /-/permissions debug page 634663505 | |
640672540 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/815#issuecomment-640672540 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/815 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY0MDY3MjU0MA== | simonw 9599 | 2020-06-08T14:40:22Z | 2020-06-08T14:40:22Z | OWNER | Here's the current tracer mechanism. Note that it captures a stacktrace (which is expensive) - but only if the tracer system has been enabled for a request. https://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/1c063fae9dba70f70244db010d55a18846640f07/datasette/tracer.py#L27-L51 For permissions checks I want to ALWAYS track those calls, not just on requests that have opted in. | {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | Group permission checks by request on /-/permissions debug page 634663505 | |
640673138 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/815#issuecomment-640673138 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/815 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY0MDY3MzEzOA== | simonw 9599 | 2020-06-08T14:41:24Z | 2020-06-08T14:41:24Z | OWNER | I could reuse that `get_task_id()` function though (I can move it to utils). | {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | Group permission checks by request on /-/permissions debug page 634663505 | |
640673405 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/815#issuecomment-640673405 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/815 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY0MDY3MzQwNQ== | simonw 9599 | 2020-06-08T14:41:55Z | 2020-06-08T14:41:55Z | OWNER | I want to be able to display the HTTP path and verb - `GET /fixtures`, `POST /fixtures/myquery` etc. | {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | Group permission checks by request on /-/permissions debug page 634663505 | |
640763899 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/816#issuecomment-640763899 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/816 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY0MDc2Mzg5OQ== | simonw 9599 | 2020-06-08T17:21:59Z | 2020-06-08T17:21:59Z | OWNER | I'm going to show how to display the current user's user-agent. | {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | Come up with a new example for extra_template_vars plugin 634783573 | |
640808161 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/817#issuecomment-640808161 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/817 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY0MDgwODE2MQ== | simonw 9599 | 2020-06-08T18:51:42Z | 2020-06-08T18:54:37Z | OWNER | I'm also going to rename `resource_identifier` to just `resource`. | {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | Drop resource_type from permission_allowed system 634844634 | |
640815550 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/816#issuecomment-640815550 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/816 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY0MDgxNTU1MA== | simonw 9599 | 2020-06-08T19:06:44Z | 2020-06-08T19:06:44Z | OWNER | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/c7d145e016522dd6ee229d4d0b3ba79a7a8877c1/docs/plugins.rst#extra_template_varstemplate-database-table-view_name-request-datasette | {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | Come up with a new example for extra_template_vars plugin 634783573 | |
640830088 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/813#issuecomment-640830088 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/813 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY0MDgzMDA4OA== | simonw 9599 | 2020-06-08T19:26:15Z | 2020-06-08T19:26:15Z | OWNER | This needs to affect the `?_where=` parameter on table pages as well. | {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | Mechanism for specifying allow_sql permission in metadata.json 634139848 | |
640831842 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/813#issuecomment-640831842 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/813 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY0MDgzMTg0Mg== | simonw 9599 | 2020-06-08T19:27:47Z | 2020-06-08T19:27:47Z | OWNER | This needs to be ready for Datasette 0.44 because without it the "view-table" permission is useless - it will protect the https://latest.datasette.io/fixtures/facetable page but will not prevent users from executing https://latest.datasette.io/fixtures?sql=select+*+from+facetable | {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | Mechanism for specifying allow_sql permission in metadata.json 634139848 | |
640837908 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/813#issuecomment-640837908 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/813 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY0MDgzNzkwOA== | simonw 9599 | 2020-06-08T19:33:03Z | 2020-06-08T19:33:03Z | OWNER | Don't forget to link to the `allow_sql` docs from the warning block here: https://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/54370853828bdf87ca844fd0fc00900e0e2e659d/docs/authentication.rst#controlling-access-to-specific-tables-and-views | {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | Mechanism for specifying allow_sql permission in metadata.json 634139848 | |
640905609 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/801#issuecomment-640905609 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/801 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY0MDkwNTYwOQ== | simonw 9599 | 2020-06-08T21:48:44Z | 2020-06-08T21:48:44Z | OWNER | Dropping this out of Datasette 0.44 again - I have enough other stuff to finish, this can wait. | {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | allow_by_query setting for configuring permissions with a SQL statement 631932926 | |
640916290 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/813#issuecomment-640916290 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/813 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY0MDkxNjI5MA== | simonw 9599 | 2020-06-08T22:16:39Z | 2020-06-08T22:17:32Z | OWNER | Naming problem: Datasette already has a config option with this name: $ datasette serve data.db --config allow_sql:1 https://datasette.readthedocs.io/en/stable/config.html#allow-sql It's confusing to have two things called `allow_sql` that do slightly different things. | {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | Mechanism for specifying allow_sql permission in metadata.json 634139848 | |
640916807 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/813#issuecomment-640916807 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/813 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY0MDkxNjgwNw== | simonw 9599 | 2020-06-08T22:18:09Z | 2020-06-08T22:18:09Z | OWNER | I could retire the `--config allow_sql:0` option entirely, since the new `metadata.json` mechanism can be used to achieve the exact same thing. I'm going to do that. | {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | Mechanism for specifying allow_sql permission in metadata.json 634139848 | |
640916991 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/806#issuecomment-640916991 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/806 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY0MDkxNjk5MQ== | simonw 9599 | 2020-06-08T22:18:45Z | 2020-06-08T22:18:45Z | OWNER | Reminder for release notes: I removed `--config allow_sql:0` - see https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/813#issuecomment-640916807 | {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | Release Datasette 0.44 632753851 | |
640924482 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/493#issuecomment-640924482 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/493 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY0MDkyNDQ4Mg== | simonw 9599 | 2020-06-08T22:39:45Z | 2020-06-08T22:39:45Z | OWNER | I'm definitely doing this rename, now that `metadata.json` is used for `allow` permissions configuration as well as-of #811. | {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | Rename metadata.json to config.json 449886319 | |
640924558 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/493#issuecomment-640924558 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/493 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY0MDkyNDU1OA== | simonw 9599 | 2020-06-08T22:40:01Z | 2020-06-08T22:40:01Z | OWNER | I'll also rename `--config` to `--setting`. | {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | Rename metadata.json to config.json 449886319 | |
640925018 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/777#issuecomment-640925018 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/777 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY0MDkyNTAxOA== | simonw 9599 | 2020-06-08T22:41:42Z | 2020-06-08T22:41:42Z | OWNER | This is particularly worth fixing now that 403 forbidden pages are much more likely due to #811. | {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | Error pages not correctly loading CSS 626171242 | |
640929693 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/818#issuecomment-640929693 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/818 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY0MDkyOTY5Mw== | simonw 9599 | 2020-06-08T22:56:38Z | 2020-06-08T22:56:38Z | OWNER | https://datasette.readthedocs.io/en/latest/plugins.html#permission-allowed-datasette-actor-action-resource has a couple of examples now. | {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | Example permissions plugin 634917088 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) , [performed_via_github_app] TEXT); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
updated_at (date) 1 ✖