issue_comments
4 rows where issue_url = "https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1176" and "updated_at" is on date 2021-01-05
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
created_at (date) 1 ✖
id ▼ | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | issue | performed_via_github_app |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
754951786 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1176#issuecomment-754951786 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1176 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc1NDk1MTc4Ng== | simonw 9599 | 2021-01-05T22:56:27Z | 2021-01-05T22:56:43Z | OWNER | Idea: introduce a `@documented` decorator which marks specific functions as part of the public, documented API. The unit tests can then confirm that anything with that decorator is both documented and tested. ```python @documented def escape_css_string(s): return _css_re.sub( lambda m: "\\" + (f"{ord(m.group()):X}".zfill(6)), s.replace("\r\n", "\n"), ) ``` Or maybe `@public`? | {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | Policy on documenting "public" datasette.utils functions 779691739 | |
754952040 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1176#issuecomment-754952040 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1176 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc1NDk1MjA0MA== | simonw 9599 | 2021-01-05T22:57:09Z | 2021-01-05T22:57:09Z | OWNER | It might be neater to move all of the non-public functions into a separate module - `datasette.utils.internal` perhaps. | {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | Policy on documenting "public" datasette.utils functions 779691739 | |
754952146 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1176#issuecomment-754952146 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1176 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc1NDk1MjE0Ng== | simonw 9599 | 2021-01-05T22:57:26Z | 2021-01-05T22:57:26Z | OWNER | Known public APIs might be worth adding type annotations to as well. | {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | Policy on documenting "public" datasette.utils functions 779691739 | |
754957378 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1176#issuecomment-754957378 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1176 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc1NDk1NzM3OA== | simonw 9599 | 2021-01-05T23:12:03Z | 2021-01-05T23:12:03Z | OWNER | This needs to be done for Datasette 1.0. At the very least I need to ensure it's clear that `datasette.utils` is not part of the public API unless explicitly marked as such. | {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | Policy on documenting "public" datasette.utils functions 779691739 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) , [performed_via_github_app] TEXT); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
updated_at (date) 1 ✖