issue_comments
5 rows where "created_at" is on date 2020-09-12 and issue = 627794879
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)
id ▼ | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | issue | performed_via_github_app |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
691526416 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/782#issuecomment-691526416 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/782 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY5MTUyNjQxNg== | simonw 9599 | 2020-09-12T18:16:36Z | 2020-09-12T18:16:36Z | OWNER | I'm going to hack together a preview of this in a branch and deploy it somewhere so people can see what I've got planned. Much easier to evaluate a working prototype than static examples. | {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | Redesign default .json format 627794879 | |
691526489 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/782#issuecomment-691526489 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/782 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY5MTUyNjQ4OQ== | simonw 9599 | 2020-09-12T18:17:16Z | 2020-09-12T18:17:16Z | OWNER | (I think I may have been over-thinking the details of this is for a couple of years now.) | {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | Redesign default .json format 627794879 | |
691526762 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/782#issuecomment-691526762 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/782 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY5MTUyNjc2Mg== | simonw 9599 | 2020-09-12T18:20:19Z | 2020-09-12T18:20:19Z | OWNER | I'd like to revisit the idea of using `?_extra=x` to opt-in to extra blocks of JSON, from #262 | {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | Redesign default .json format 627794879 | |
691526878 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/782#issuecomment-691526878 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/782 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY5MTUyNjg3OA== | simonw 9599 | 2020-09-12T18:21:41Z | 2020-09-12T18:22:20Z | OWNER | Would it be so bad if the default format had a `"rows"` key containing the array of rows? Maybe it wouldn't. The reason I always use `?_shape=array` is because I want an array of objects, rather than an array of arrays that I have to match up again with their columns. A default format that's an object rather than array also gives something for the `?_extra=` parameter to add its extras to. | {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | Redesign default .json format 627794879 | |
691554088 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/782#issuecomment-691554088 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/782 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY5MTU1NDA4OA== | simonw 9599 | 2020-09-12T21:39:03Z | 2020-09-12T21:39:03Z | OWNER | Plan: release a new release of Datasette (probably 0.49) with the new JSON API design, but provide a plugin called something like `datasette-api-0-48` which runs as ASGI wrapping middleware and internally rewrites incoming requests to e.g. `/db/table.json` to behave if they have the `?_extra=` params on them necessary to produce the 0.48 version of the JSON. Anyone who has built applications against 0.48 can install that plugin. | {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | Redesign default .json format 627794879 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) , [performed_via_github_app] TEXT); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);