issue_comments
5 rows where issue = 1473411197
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)
id ▼ | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | issue | performed_via_github_app |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1335984268 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1927#issuecomment-1335984268 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1927 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5PoYCM | simonw 9599 | 2022-12-03T00:26:26Z | 2022-12-03T00:26:26Z | OWNER | Also: the documentation should clarify that you can call this API multiple times when using the `rows` option. (It will probably grow `"alter": true` soon too). | {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | ignore:true/replace:true options for /db/-/create API 1473411197 | |
1336099368 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1927#issuecomment-1336099368 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1927 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5Po0Io | simonw 9599 | 2022-12-03T06:56:36Z | 2022-12-03T06:56:36Z | OWNER | Neither of these options make sense if you didn't pass a `"pk"`. My initial implementation spotted if the `pk` was missing and looked it up from the table, but actually I don't think that makes sense - if you know the table exists and hence don't pass the `pk` you should be using `/-/insert` or `/-/upsert` instead. So maybe this work should expanded to include validation that checks if the table exists already - and if it does, confirms that the primary key (and maybe even the columns) are the same as for that existing table. Of course if you only send `row` or `rows` then checking `columns` doesn't completely make sense - but we could check that the rows you have sent are equal to or a subset of the columns in the table. We could even check the column types as well, as seen in: - #1910 | {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | ignore:true/replace:true options for /db/-/create API 1473411197 | |
1336099533 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1927#issuecomment-1336099533 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1927 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5Po0LN | simonw 9599 | 2022-12-03T06:57:52Z | 2022-12-03T06:57:52Z | OWNER | I'm going to push what I have anyway. I'll keep this issue open while I think through the above comment. | {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | ignore:true/replace:true options for /db/-/create API 1473411197 | |
1336099588 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1927#issuecomment-1336099588 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1927 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5Po0ME | simonw 9599 | 2022-12-03T06:58:14Z | 2022-12-03T06:58:14Z | OWNER | I have not yet documented the new `insert` and `replace` options. | {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | ignore:true/replace:true options for /db/-/create API 1473411197 | |
1339910494 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1927#issuecomment-1339910494 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1927 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5P3Wle | simonw 9599 | 2022-12-06T19:37:39Z | 2022-12-06T19:37:39Z | OWNER | I'll finish this after I land: - #1931 | {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | ignore:true/replace:true options for /db/-/create API 1473411197 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) , [performed_via_github_app] TEXT); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);