issue_comments

Table actions

1 row where issue = 1571207083

✎ View and edit SQL

This data as json, CSV (advanced)

Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)

id ▼ html_url issue_url node_id user created_at updated_at author_association body reactions issue performed_via_github_app
1418288077 https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/2016#issuecomment-1418288077 https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/2016 IC_kwDOBm6k_c5UiVvN simonw 9599 2023-02-05T22:56:43Z 2023-02-05T22:56:43Z OWNER This absolutely makes sense. One of the biggest goals for Datasette 1.0 is "documented template contexts" - for any default template in Datasette that people might want to over-ride there should be documentation that describes the available context variables, plus tests that ensure they don't accidentally get broken by future changes. Ensuring description/title/etc are available on the index page feels like it fits well into that bucket. {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} Database metadata fields like description are not available in the index page template's context 1571207083  

Advanced export

JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object

CSV options: 

CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] (
   [html_url] TEXT,
   [issue_url] TEXT,
   [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
   [node_id] TEXT,
   [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
   [created_at] TEXT,
   [updated_at] TEXT,
   [author_association] TEXT,
   [body] TEXT,
   [reactions] TEXT,
   [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id])
, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue]
                ON [issue_comments] ([issue]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user]
                ON [issue_comments] ([user]);