home / github

Menu
  • GraphQL API

issue_comments

Table actions
  • GraphQL API for issue_comments

8 rows where issue = 315960272

✎ View and edit SQL

This data as json, CSV (advanced)

Suggested facets: user, author_association, created_at (date), updated_at (date)

id ▼ html_url issue_url node_id user created_at updated_at author_association body reactions issue performed_via_github_app
382808266 https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/227#issuecomment-382808266 https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/227 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM4MjgwODI2Ng== simonw 9599 2018-04-19T16:59:23Z 2018-04-19T16:59:23Z OWNER Maybe this should have a second argument indicating which codepath was being handled. That way plugins could say "only inject this extra context variable on the row page". {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} prepare_context() plugin hook 315960272  
382958693 https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/227#issuecomment-382958693 https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/227 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM4Mjk1ODY5Mw== simonw 9599 2018-04-20T03:15:52Z 2018-04-20T03:15:52Z OWNER A better way to do this would be with many different plugin hooks, one for each view. {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} prepare_context() plugin hook 315960272  
382959857 https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/227#issuecomment-382959857 https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/227 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM4Mjk1OTg1Nw== simonw 9599 2018-04-20T03:21:43Z 2018-04-20T03:21:43Z OWNER Plus a generic prepare_context() hook called in the common render method. prepare_context_table(), prepare_context_row() etc Arguments are context, request, self (hence can access self.ds) {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} prepare_context() plugin hook 315960272  
382964794 https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/227#issuecomment-382964794 https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/227 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM4Mjk2NDc5NA== simonw 9599 2018-04-20T03:45:18Z 2018-04-20T03:45:18Z OWNER What if the context needs to make await calls? One possible option: plugins can either manipulate the context in place OR they can return an awaitable. If they do that, the caller will await it. {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} prepare_context() plugin hook 315960272  
382966604 https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/227#issuecomment-382966604 https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/227 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM4Mjk2NjYwNA== simonw 9599 2018-04-20T03:54:56Z 2018-04-20T03:54:56Z OWNER Should this differentiate between preparing the data to be sent back as JSON and preparing the context for the template? {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} prepare_context() plugin hook 315960272  
382967238 https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/227#issuecomment-382967238 https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/227 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM4Mjk2NzIzOA== simonw 9599 2018-04-20T03:58:09Z 2018-04-20T03:58:09Z OWNER Maybe prepare_table_data() vs prepare_table_context() {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} prepare_context() plugin hook 315960272  
439194286 https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/227#issuecomment-439194286 https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/227 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQzOTE5NDI4Ng== carlmjohnson 222245 2018-11-15T21:20:37Z 2018-11-15T21:20:37Z NONE I'm diving back into https://salaries.news.baltimoresun.com and what I really want is the ability to inject the request into my context. {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} prepare_context() plugin hook 315960272  
603534725 https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/227#issuecomment-603534725 https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/227 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDYwMzUzNDcyNQ== simonw 9599 2020-03-24T22:19:54Z 2020-03-24T22:19:54Z OWNER I think the [extra_template_vars()](https://datasette.readthedocs.io/en/stable/plugins.html#extra-template-vars-template-database-table-view-name-request-datasette) hook covers this. {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} prepare_context() plugin hook 315960272  

Advanced export

JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object

CSV options:

CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] (
   [html_url] TEXT,
   [issue_url] TEXT,
   [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
   [node_id] TEXT,
   [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
   [created_at] TEXT,
   [updated_at] TEXT,
   [author_association] TEXT,
   [body] TEXT,
   [reactions] TEXT,
   [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id])
, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue]
                ON [issue_comments] ([issue]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user]
                ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
Powered by Datasette · Queries took 41.759ms · About: simonw/datasette-graphql