issue_comments
7 rows where issue = 323223872
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: user, author_association, reactions, created_at (date), updated_at (date)
| id ▼ | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | issue | performed_via_github_app |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 544318517 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/260#issuecomment-544318517 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/260 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDU0NDMxODUxNw== | simonw 9599 | 2019-10-21T01:48:24Z | 2019-10-21T01:48:24Z | OWNER | This came up in #588 - it would be helpful if this would spot things like `"queries"` defined against the tables block when they should be defined against a database. | {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | Validate metadata.json on startup 323223872 | |
| 1051473892 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/260#issuecomment-1051473892 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/260 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c4-rDfk | zaneselvans 596279 | 2022-02-26T02:24:15Z | 2022-02-26T02:24:15Z | NONE | Is there already functionality that can be used to validate the `metadata.json` file? Is there a JSON Schema that defines it? Or a validation that's available via datasette with Python? We're working on [automatically building the metadata](https://github.com/catalyst-cooperative/pudl/pull/1479) in CI and when we deploy to cloud run, and it would be nice to be able to check whether the the metadata we're outputting is valid in our tests. | {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | Validate metadata.json on startup 323223872 | |
| 1234926923 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/260#issuecomment-1234926923 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/260 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5Jm31L | simonw 9599 | 2022-09-02T00:04:26Z | 2022-09-02T00:04:45Z | OWNER | Interesting example of why this would be valuable here: - https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1798 This YAML file: ```yaml title: Some title description_html: |- <p>This is an experiment.</p> databases: off: tables: products_from_owners: title: products_from_owners* ``` Was loaded as equivalent to this JSON: ```json { "title": "Some title", "description_html": "<p>This is an experiment.</p>", "databases": { "false": { "tables": { "products_from_owners": { "title": "products_from_owners*" } } } } } ``` Validation that caught this would have been useful. | {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | Validate metadata.json on startup 323223872 | |
| 1234927627 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/260#issuecomment-1234927627 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/260 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5Jm4AL | simonw 9599 | 2022-09-02T00:05:43Z | 2022-09-02T00:05:43Z | OWNER | I'm inclined to consider [Pydantic](https://pydantic-docs.helpmanual.io/) for this, since it is widely used now and can generate really good error messages. | {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | Validate metadata.json on startup 323223872 | |
| 1235079469 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/260#issuecomment-1235079469 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/260 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5JndEt | zaneselvans 596279 | 2022-09-02T05:24:59Z | 2022-09-02T05:24:59Z | NONE | @zschira is working with Pydantic while converting between and validating JSON frictionless datapackage descriptors that annotate an SQLite DB ([extracted from FERC's XBRL data](https://github.com/catalyst-cooperative/ferc-xbrl-extractor)) and the Datasette YAML metadata [so we can publish them with Datasette](https://github.com/catalyst-cooperative/pudl/pull/1831). Maybe there's some overlap? We've been loving Pydantic. | {"total_count": 1, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 1} | Validate metadata.json on startup 323223872 | |
| 1235785955 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/260#issuecomment-1235785955 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/260 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5JqJjj | simonw 9599 | 2022-09-02T18:18:06Z | 2022-09-02T18:18:06Z | OWNER | Did some related research work in this issue: - https://github.com/simonw/shot-scraper/issues/28 | {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | Validate metadata.json on startup 323223872 | |
| 1600778057 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/260#issuecomment-1600778057 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/260 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5fae9J | simonw 9599 | 2023-06-21T12:51:22Z | 2023-06-21T12:51:22Z | OWNER | Another example of confusion from this today: https://discord.com/channels/823971286308356157/823971286941302908/1121042411238457374 See also https://gist.github.com/BinomeDeNewton/651ac8b50dd5420f8e54d1682eee5fed?permalink_comment_id=4605982#gistcomment-4605982 | {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | Validate metadata.json on startup 323223872 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] (
[html_url] TEXT,
[issue_url] TEXT,
[id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
[node_id] TEXT,
[user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
[created_at] TEXT,
[updated_at] TEXT,
[author_association] TEXT,
[body] TEXT,
[reactions] TEXT,
[issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id])
, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue]
ON [issue_comments] ([issue]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user]
ON [issue_comments] ([user]);