issue_comments
2 rows where issue = 438048318
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)
id ▼ | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | issue | performed_via_github_app |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
487537452 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/pull/437#issuecomment-487537452 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/437 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ4NzUzNzQ1Mg== | russss 45057 | 2019-04-29T10:58:49Z | 2019-04-29T10:58:49Z | CONTRIBUTOR | I've just spotted that this implements #215. | {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | Add inspect and prepare_sanic hooks 438048318 | |
505087020 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/pull/437#issuecomment-505087020 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/437 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDUwNTA4NzAyMA== | simonw 9599 | 2019-06-24T16:38:56Z | 2019-06-24T16:38:56Z | OWNER | Closing this because it doesn't really fit the new model of inspect (though we should discuss in #465 how to further evolve this feature) and because as-of #272 we no longer use Sanic - though #520 will implement the equivalent of `prepare_sanic` against ASGI. | {"total_count": 1, "+1": 1, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | Add inspect and prepare_sanic hooks 438048318 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) , [performed_via_github_app] TEXT); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);