issue_comments
20 rows where issue = 628499086
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)
id ▼ | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | issue | performed_via_github_app |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
636906581 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/790#issuecomment-636906581 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/790 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDYzNjkwNjU4MQ== | simonw 9599 | 2020-06-01T14:56:42Z | 2020-06-01T14:56:42Z | OWNER | I can use the new signed values support from #785 to help build this. | {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | "flash messages" mechanism 628499086 | |
636906773 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/790#issuecomment-636906773 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/790 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDYzNjkwNjc3Mw== | simonw 9599 | 2020-06-01T14:57:02Z | 2020-06-01T14:58:14Z | OWNER | Actually I'm inclined to use cookies now, ala Django: https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/3.0/ref/contrib/messages/ > This class stores the message data in a cookie (signed with a secret hash to prevent manipulation) to persist notifications across requests. Old messages are dropped if the cookie data size would exceed 2048 bytes. | {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | "flash messages" mechanism 628499086 | |
636908972 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/790#issuecomment-636908972 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/790 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDYzNjkwODk3Mg== | simonw 9599 | 2020-06-01T15:01:00Z | 2020-06-01T15:01:00Z | OWNER | Setting messages just needs access to the response. Reading messages needs access to both request AND response, since it needs to clear the messages that are being displayed. That's if the messages are persisted exclusively in cookies - which makes sense for Django since it's designed to run as many different load-balanced processes. Since Datasette is a single process which can access an on-file database, maybe consider storing the flash messages within Datasette memory itself - a sort of session mechanism? | {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | "flash messages" mechanism 628499086 | |
636912730 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/790#issuecomment-636912730 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/790 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDYzNjkxMjczMA== | simonw 9599 | 2020-06-01T15:08:13Z | 2020-06-01T15:08:13Z | OWNER | I'm going to build the first version of this with signed cookies. I'm inclined to do this all on the request object, since it's the object representing the current request as it flows through the application. I need the ability to remember which messages were set and which need to be cleared, so I need to do that on something that is available for the lifetime of the request. | {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | "flash messages" mechanism 628499086 | |
636915499 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/790#issuecomment-636915499 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/790 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDYzNjkxNTQ5OQ== | simonw 9599 | 2020-06-01T15:13:40Z | 2020-06-01T15:13:40Z | OWNER | Maybe two utility functions: `add_message(request, message)` - adds a Flash message (will be set later) `read_and_clear_messages(request)` - reads messages and sets them to be cleared Problem: the `request` object isn't created at the very top of the stack - it's actually created within each view. So maybe I need to move its creation up to the top of the routing stuff so that the code that returns the response can see it? | {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | "flash messages" mechanism 628499086 | |
636916107 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/790#issuecomment-636916107 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/790 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDYzNjkxNjEwNw== | simonw 9599 | 2020-06-01T15:14:30Z | 2020-06-01T15:15:52Z | OWNER | Alternative: `datasette.add_message(message)` and `datasette.read_and_clear_messages()` - these would need some kind of dark magic to ensure that the message was associated with the current request flowing through the system though, since that `datasette` object is shared my multiple concurrent requests. Maybe use a request correlation ID that gets added to the scope? This is all getting a bit messy. | {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | "flash messages" mechanism 628499086 | |
636920304 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/790#issuecomment-636920304 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/790 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDYzNjkyMDMwNA== | simonw 9599 | 2020-06-01T15:22:15Z | 2020-06-01T15:22:15Z | OWNER | Here's how the Django stuff works: https://github.com/django/django/blob/master/django/contrib/messages/storage/base.py Notably the messages are mostly dealt with on the request object, with a piece of middleware that reads from the request and modifies the response (to set or clear cookies) right at the end: https://github.com/django/django/blob/master/django/contrib/messages/middleware.py | {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | "flash messages" mechanism 628499086 | |
636922104 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/790#issuecomment-636922104 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/790 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDYzNjkyMjEwNA== | simonw 9599 | 2020-06-01T15:25:39Z | 2020-06-01T15:25:39Z | OWNER | What if I use a mutable key on `scope` to track messages for the duration of the request? Is that an OK thing to do? ASGI spec says this: https://asgi.readthedocs.io/en/latest/specs/main.html#middleware > ### Middleware > > It is possible to have ASGI "middleware" - code that plays the role of both server and application, taking in a scope and the send/receive awaitables, potentially modifying them, and then calling an inner application. > > When middleware is modifying the scope, it should make a copy of the scope object before mutating it and passing it to the inner application, as changes may leak upstream otherwise. In particular, you should not assume that the copy of the scope you pass down to the application is the one that it ends up using, as there may be other middleware in the way; thus, do not keep a reference to it and try to mutate it outside of the initial ASGI constructor callable that receives `scope`. Your one and only chance to add to it is before you hand control to the child application. | {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | "flash messages" mechanism 628499086 | |
636925354 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/790#issuecomment-636925354 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/790 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDYzNjkyNTM1NA== | simonw 9599 | 2020-06-01T15:32:02Z | 2020-06-01T15:32:02Z | OWNER | If `scope` had an immutable correlation ID I could use that with a dict somewhere mapping `correlation_id` to a messages object. The problem then is how do I know to clean up the memory used by that dictionary when the request flows out of the system? I guess the code that updates the cookies in the response could do that. | {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | "flash messages" mechanism 628499086 | |
636934016 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/790#issuecomment-636934016 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/790 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDYzNjkzNDAxNg== | simonw 9599 | 2020-06-01T15:49:26Z | 2020-06-01T15:49:26Z | OWNER | Flask and Django both support "types" of message - info, warning etc. I think I should do the same. | {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | "flash messages" mechanism 628499086 | |
636959774 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/790#issuecomment-636959774 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/790 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDYzNjk1OTc3NA== | simonw 9599 | 2020-06-01T16:15:33Z | 2020-06-01T16:15:33Z | OWNER | It would be neat if this was driven by a method on `datasette` just because that's already the object passed to plugins as a documented API. | {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | "flash messages" mechanism 628499086 | |
636978065 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/790#issuecomment-636978065 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/790 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDYzNjk3ODA2NQ== | simonw 9599 | 2020-06-01T16:42:59Z | 2020-06-01T17:44:12Z | OWNER | `datasette.add_message(request, message, type=datasette.INFO)` Then later: `datasette.write_messages_to_response(request, response)` Writes the messages as cookies in the response. `datasette.fetch_and_clear_messages(request, response)` To display messages and clears them from the response. | {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | "flash messages" mechanism 628499086 | |
637009509 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/790#issuecomment-637009509 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/790 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDYzNzAwOTUwOQ== | simonw 9599 | 2020-06-01T17:44:55Z | 2020-06-01T17:46:18Z | OWNER | Problem with `datasette.fetch_and_clear_messages(request, response)` is that I want to call it from the template (so we only clear messages if they have been displayed) - but by that point in the code the `Response` object has not yet been created, so it can't have cookie set on it to clear the list of messages. Solution: call it `datasette.show_messages(request)` and have it update internal state on the `datasette` object such that a later call to `write_messages_to_response(request, response)` knows to clear the cookie. | {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | "flash messages" mechanism 628499086 | |
637066496 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/790#issuecomment-637066496 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/790 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDYzNzA2NjQ5Ng== | simonw 9599 | 2020-06-01T19:48:20Z | 2020-06-01T19:48:20Z | OWNER | I'm going to stash these on the `request` object after all, so the memory used for the messages gets automatically cleaned up at the end of the request. | {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | "flash messages" mechanism 628499086 | |
637699337 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/790#issuecomment-637699337 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/790 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDYzNzY5OTMzNw== | simonw 9599 | 2020-06-02T17:34:47Z | 2020-06-02T17:34:47Z | OWNER | I'm going to use a output renderer plugin to test this, since then my unit tests can run against custom code that both sets and displays messages. | {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | "flash messages" mechanism 628499086 | |
637708090 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/790#issuecomment-637708090 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/790 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDYzNzcwODA5MA== | simonw 9599 | 2020-06-02T17:52:30Z | 2020-06-02T17:52:30Z | OWNER | I need to make sure that any time cookies are set there's no cache-control header (or it is set to private). | {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | "flash messages" mechanism 628499086 | |
637790860 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/790#issuecomment-637790860 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/790 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDYzNzc5MDg2MA== | simonw 9599 | 2020-06-02T20:34:15Z | 2020-06-02T20:34:15Z | OWNER | The `/-/messages` debug tool will need CSRF protection or people will be able to add messages using a hidden form on another website. | {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | "flash messages" mechanism 628499086 | |
637793590 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/790#issuecomment-637793590 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/790 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDYzNzc5MzU5MA== | simonw 9599 | 2020-06-02T20:40:02Z | 2020-06-02T20:40:02Z | OWNER | From https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/698#issuecomment-621037724 > Concept for displaying a success message: > > <img width="662" alt="fixtures__compound_three_primary_keys__1_001_rows" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9599/80571201-0a1b4f00-89b1-11ea-8688-2e3e4304e475.png"> > CSS: > > ```css > .success { > padding: 1em; > border: 1px solid green; > background-color: #c7fbc7; > } | {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | "flash messages" mechanism 628499086 | |
637813616 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/790#issuecomment-637813616 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/790 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDYzNzgxMzYxNg== | simonw 9599 | 2020-06-02T21:22:02Z | 2020-06-02T21:22:02Z | OWNER | Debug tool is live here: https://latest.datasette.io/-/messages Documentation is here: https://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/master/docs/internals.rst#add_messagerequest-message-message_typedatasetteinfo | {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | "flash messages" mechanism 628499086 | |
637843494 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/790#issuecomment-637843494 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/790 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDYzNzg0MzQ5NA== | simonw 9599 | 2020-06-02T22:35:22Z | 2020-06-02T22:35:22Z | OWNER | Message CSS is now demonstrated on https://latest.datasette.io/-/patterns | {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | "flash messages" mechanism 628499086 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) , [performed_via_github_app] TEXT); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);