home / github

Menu
  • GraphQL API

issue_comments

Table actions
  • GraphQL API for issue_comments

8 rows where issue = 634663505

✎ View and edit SQL

This data as json, CSV (advanced)

Suggested facets: user, author_association, reactions, created_at (date), updated_at (date)

id ▼ html_url issue_url node_id user created_at updated_at author_association body reactions issue performed_via_github_app
640656143 https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/815#issuecomment-640656143 https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/815 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY0MDY1NjE0Mw== simonw 9599 2020-06-08T14:25:48Z 2020-06-08T14:26:45Z OWNER Will we need a request correlation ID for this? Multiple asyncio threads can write things to the `ds._permission_checks` deque at the same time. {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} Group permission checks by request on /-/permissions debug page 634663505  
640671241 https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/815#issuecomment-640671241 https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/815 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY0MDY3MTI0MQ== simonw 9599 2020-06-08T14:38:04Z 2020-06-08T14:38:04Z OWNER Alternative to a correlation ID would be to use the existing `AsgiTracer` / `capture_traces` mechanism. That's probably smarter. It could even start logging SQL queries to an in-memory deque too, so a debug tool could show you queries executed by other requests! {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} Group permission checks by request on /-/permissions debug page 634663505  
640671398 https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/815#issuecomment-640671398 https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/815 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY0MDY3MTM5OA== simonw 9599 2020-06-08T14:38:20Z 2020-06-08T14:38:20Z OWNER But `ds._permission_checks` is also used for unit tests. {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} Group permission checks by request on /-/permissions debug page 634663505  
640672540 https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/815#issuecomment-640672540 https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/815 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY0MDY3MjU0MA== simonw 9599 2020-06-08T14:40:22Z 2020-06-08T14:40:22Z OWNER Here's the current tracer mechanism. Note that it captures a stacktrace (which is expensive) - but only if the tracer system has been enabled for a request. https://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/1c063fae9dba70f70244db010d55a18846640f07/datasette/tracer.py#L27-L51 For permissions checks I want to ALWAYS track those calls, not just on requests that have opted in. {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} Group permission checks by request on /-/permissions debug page 634663505  
640673138 https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/815#issuecomment-640673138 https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/815 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY0MDY3MzEzOA== simonw 9599 2020-06-08T14:41:24Z 2020-06-08T14:41:24Z OWNER I could reuse that `get_task_id()` function though (I can move it to utils). {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} Group permission checks by request on /-/permissions debug page 634663505  
640673405 https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/815#issuecomment-640673405 https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/815 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY0MDY3MzQwNQ== simonw 9599 2020-06-08T14:41:55Z 2020-06-08T14:41:55Z OWNER I want to be able to display the HTTP path and verb - `GET /fixtures`, `POST /fixtures/myquery` etc. {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} Group permission checks by request on /-/permissions debug page 634663505  
740383884 https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/815#issuecomment-740383884 https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/815 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc0MDM4Mzg4NA== sturzl 11761973 2020-12-08T05:23:18Z 2020-12-08T05:23:18Z NONE hey! I'd like to take a look at this if you're open to a PR for it {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} Group permission checks by request on /-/permissions debug page 634663505  
740385032 https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/815#issuecomment-740385032 https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/815 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc0MDM4NTAzMg== simonw 9599 2020-12-08T05:26:09Z 2020-12-08T05:26:16Z OWNER Sure! It's a bit of a fiddle one - I've not found an approach that I like, but I also haven't thought about it since June. I'd love to see what you come up with! {"total_count": 1, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 1, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} Group permission checks by request on /-/permissions debug page 634663505  

Advanced export

JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object

CSV options:

CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] (
   [html_url] TEXT,
   [issue_url] TEXT,
   [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
   [node_id] TEXT,
   [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
   [created_at] TEXT,
   [updated_at] TEXT,
   [author_association] TEXT,
   [body] TEXT,
   [reactions] TEXT,
   [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id])
, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue]
                ON [issue_comments] ([issue]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user]
                ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
Powered by Datasette · Queries took 36.61ms · About: simonw/datasette-graphql