issue_comments
7 rows where issue = 705215230
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)
| id ▼ | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | issue | performed_via_github_app |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 695855646 | https://github.com/dogsheep/dogsheep-beta/issues/26#issuecomment-695855646 | https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/dogsheep-beta/issues/26 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY5NTg1NTY0Ng== | simonw 9599 | 2020-09-21T00:16:11Z | 2020-09-21T00:16:11Z | MEMBER | Should I do this with offset/limit or should I do proper keyset pagination? I think keyset because then it will work well for the full search interface with no filters or search string. | {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | Pagination 705215230 | |
| 695855723 | https://github.com/dogsheep/dogsheep-beta/issues/26#issuecomment-695855723 | https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/dogsheep-beta/issues/26 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY5NTg1NTcyMw== | simonw 9599 | 2020-09-21T00:16:52Z | 2020-09-21T00:17:53Z | MEMBER | It feels a bit weird to implement keyset pagination against results sorted by `rank` because the ranks could change substantially if the search index gets updated while the user is paginating. I may just ignore that though. If you want reliable pagination you can get it by sorting by date. Maybe it doesn't even make sense to offer pagination if you sort by relevance? | {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | Pagination 705215230 | |
| 695856398 | https://github.com/dogsheep/dogsheep-beta/issues/26#issuecomment-695856398 | https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/dogsheep-beta/issues/26 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY5NTg1NjM5OA== | simonw 9599 | 2020-09-21T00:22:20Z | 2020-09-21T00:22:20Z | MEMBER | I'm going to try for keyset pagination sorted by relevance just as a learning exercise. | {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | Pagination 705215230 | |
| 695856967 | https://github.com/dogsheep/dogsheep-beta/issues/26#issuecomment-695856967 | https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/dogsheep-beta/issues/26 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY5NTg1Njk2Nw== | simonw 9599 | 2020-09-21T00:26:59Z | 2020-09-21T00:26:59Z | MEMBER | It's a shame Datasette doesn't currently have an easy way to implement sorted-by-rank keyset-paginated using a TableView or QueryView. I'll have to do this using the custom SQL query constructed in the plugin: https://github.com/dogsheep/dogsheep-beta/blob/bed9df2b3ef68189e2e445427721a28f4e9b4887/dogsheep_beta/__init__.py#L8-L43 | {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | Pagination 705215230 | |
| 695875274 | https://github.com/dogsheep/dogsheep-beta/issues/26#issuecomment-695875274 | https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/dogsheep-beta/issues/26 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY5NTg3NTI3NA== | simonw 9599 | 2020-09-21T02:28:58Z | 2020-09-21T02:28:58Z | MEMBER | Datasette's implementation is complex because it has to support compound primary keys: https://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/a258339a935d8d29a95940ef1db01e98bb85ae63/datasette/utils/__init__.py#L88-L114 - but that's not something that's needed for dogsheep-beta. | {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | Pagination 705215230 | |
| 695879237 | https://github.com/dogsheep/dogsheep-beta/issues/26#issuecomment-695879237 | https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/dogsheep-beta/issues/26 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY5NTg3OTIzNw== | simonw 9599 | 2020-09-21T02:53:29Z | 2020-09-21T02:53:29Z | MEMBER | If previous page ended at `2018-02-11T16:32:53+00:00`: ```sql select search_index.rowid, search_index.type, search_index.key, search_index.title, search_index.category, search_index.timestamp, search_index.search_1 from search_index where date("timestamp") = '2018-02-11' and timestamp < '2018-02-11T16:32:53+00:00' order by search_index.timestamp desc, rowid limit 41 ``` | {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | Pagination 705215230 | |
| 695879531 | https://github.com/dogsheep/dogsheep-beta/issues/26#issuecomment-695879531 | https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/dogsheep-beta/issues/26 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY5NTg3OTUzMQ== | simonw 9599 | 2020-09-21T02:55:28Z | 2020-09-21T02:55:54Z | MEMBER | Actually for the tie-breaker it should be something like https://latest.datasette.io/fixtures?sql=select+pk%2C+created%2C+planet_int%2C+on_earth%2C+state%2C+city_id%2C+neighborhood%2C+tags%2C+complex_array%2C+distinct_some_null+from+facetable+where+%28created+%3E+%3Ap1+or+%28created+%3D+%3Ap1+and+%28%28pk+%3E+%3Ap0%29%29%29%29+order+by+created%2C+pk+limit+11&p0=10&p1=2019-01-16+08%3A00%3A00 ```sql where ( created > :p1 or ( created = :p1 and ((pk > :p0)) ) ) ``` But with `rowid` and `timestamp` in place of `pk` and `created`. | {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | Pagination 705215230 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] (
[html_url] TEXT,
[issue_url] TEXT,
[id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
[node_id] TEXT,
[user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
[created_at] TEXT,
[updated_at] TEXT,
[author_association] TEXT,
[body] TEXT,
[reactions] TEXT,
[issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id])
, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue]
ON [issue_comments] ([issue]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user]
ON [issue_comments] ([user]);