issue_comments
15 rows where user = 41546558
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: issue_url, author_association, reactions, issue, created_at (date), updated_at (date)
| id ▼ | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | issue | performed_via_github_app |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 623845014 | https://github.com/dogsheep/dogsheep-photos/issues/16#issuecomment-623845014 | https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/dogsheep-photos/issues/16 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDYyMzg0NTAxNA== | RhetTbull 41546558 | 2020-05-05T03:55:14Z | 2020-05-05T03:56:24Z | CONTRIBUTOR | I'm traveling w/o access to my Mac so can't help with any code right now. I suspected ZSCENEIDENTIFIER was a foreign key into one of these psi.sqlite tables. But looks like you're on to something connecting groups to assets. As for the UUID, I think there's two ints because each is 64-bits but UUIDs are 128-bits. Thus they need to be combined to get the 128 bit UUID. You might be able to use Apple's [NSUUID](https://developer.apple.com/documentation/foundation/nsuuid?language=objc), for example, by wrapping with pyObjC. Here's one [example](https://github.com/ronaldoussoren/pyobjc/blob/881c82a7ba90f193934b52b44143360c80dce5e5/pyobjc-framework-Cocoa/PyObjCTest/test_nsuuid.py) of using this in PyObjC's test suite. Interesting it's stored this way instead of a UUIDString as in Photos.sqlite. Perhaps it for faster indexing. | {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | Import machine-learning detected labels (dog, llama etc) from Apple Photos 612287234 | |
| 624284539 | https://github.com/dogsheep/dogsheep-photos/issues/17#issuecomment-624284539 | https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/dogsheep-photos/issues/17 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDYyNDI4NDUzOQ== | RhetTbull 41546558 | 2020-05-05T20:20:05Z | 2020-05-05T20:20:05Z | CONTRIBUTOR | FYI, I've got an [issue](https://github.com/RhetTbull/osxphotos/issues/25) to make osxphotos cross-platform but it's low on my priority list. About 90% of the functionality could be done cross-platform but right now the MacOS specific stuff is embedded throughout and would take some work. Though I try to minimize it, there's sprinklings of ObjC & Applescript throughout osxphotos. | {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | Only install osxphotos if running on macOS 612860531 | |
| 626390317 | https://github.com/dogsheep/dogsheep-photos/issues/21#issuecomment-626390317 | https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/dogsheep-photos/issues/21 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDYyNjM5MDMxNw== | RhetTbull 41546558 | 2020-05-10T21:11:24Z | 2020-05-10T21:50:58Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Ugh....Yeah, I think easiest is to catch the exception and return no place as you suggest. This particular bit of code involves un-archiving a serialized NSKeyedArchiver which uses an object table and it is certainly possible to create a circular reference that way. Because this is happening in the decode, the circular reference must be in the original data. Does Photos show valid reverse geolocation info for the photo in question? If so, Photos may be doing something beyond a simple decode of the binary plist. For now, I'll push a patch to catch the exception. | {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | bpylist.archiver.CircularReference: archive has a cycle with uid(13) 615474990 | |
| 626395507 | https://github.com/dogsheep/dogsheep-photos/issues/21#issuecomment-626395507 | https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/dogsheep-photos/issues/21 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDYyNjM5NTUwNw== | RhetTbull 41546558 | 2020-05-10T21:54:45Z | 2020-05-10T21:54:45Z | CONTRIBUTOR | @simonw does Photos show valid reverse geolocation info? Are you sure you're using [bpylist2](https://github.com/xa4a/bpylist2) and not bpylist? They're both unfortunately imported as "bpylist" so if you somehow got the wrong (original bpylist) version installed, it could be the issue. | {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | bpylist.archiver.CircularReference: archive has a cycle with uid(13) 615474990 | |
| 626395641 | https://github.com/dogsheep/dogsheep-photos/issues/21#issuecomment-626395641 | https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/dogsheep-photos/issues/21 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDYyNjM5NTY0MQ== | RhetTbull 41546558 | 2020-05-10T21:55:54Z | 2020-05-10T21:55:54Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Did removing old bpylist solve the original problem or do you still have a photo that throws circular reference? | {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | bpylist.archiver.CircularReference: archive has a cycle with uid(13) 615474990 | |
| 626396379 | https://github.com/dogsheep/dogsheep-photos/issues/21#issuecomment-626396379 | https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/dogsheep-photos/issues/21 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDYyNjM5NjM3OQ== | RhetTbull 41546558 | 2020-05-10T22:01:48Z | 2020-05-10T22:01:48Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Frustrates me when package authors create a "drop in" replacement with the same import name...this kind of thing has bitten me more than once! Would've been nicer I think for bpylist2 to do "import bpylist2 as bpylist" | {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | bpylist.archiver.CircularReference: archive has a cycle with uid(13) 615474990 | |
| 626667235 | https://github.com/dogsheep/dogsheep-photos/issues/22#issuecomment-626667235 | https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/dogsheep-photos/issues/22 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDYyNjY2NzIzNQ== | RhetTbull 41546558 | 2020-05-11T12:20:34Z | 2020-05-11T12:20:34Z | CONTRIBUTOR | @simonw FYI, osxphotos includes a built in ExifTool class that uses [exiftool](https://exiftool.org/) to read and write exif data. It's not exposed yet in the docs because I really only use it right now in the osphotos command line interface to write tags when exporting. In v0.28.16 (just pushed) I added an ExifTool.as_dict() method which will give you a dict with all the exif tags in a file. For example: ```python import osxphotos photos = osxphotos.PhotosDB().photos() exiftool = osxphotos.exiftool.ExifTool(photos[0].path) exifdata = exiftool.as_dict() tags = exifdata["IPTC:Keywords"] ``` Not as elegant perhaps as a python only implementation because ExifTool has to make subprocess calls to an external tool but exiftool is by far the best tool available for reading and writing EXIF data and it does support HEIC. As for implementation, ExifTool uses a singleton pattern so the first time you instantiate it, it spawns an IPC to exiftool but then keeps it open and uses the same process for any subsequent calls (even on different files). | {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | Try out ExifReader 615626118 | |
| 627007458 | https://github.com/dogsheep/dogsheep-photos/issues/22#issuecomment-627007458 | https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/dogsheep-photos/issues/22 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDYyNzAwNzQ1OA== | RhetTbull 41546558 | 2020-05-11T22:51:52Z | 2020-05-11T22:52:26Z | CONTRIBUTOR | I'm not familiar with `ExifReader`. I wrote my own wrapper around `exiftool` because I wanted a simple way to write EXIF data when exporting photos (e.g. writing out to PersonInImage and keywords to IPTC:Keywords) and the existing python packages like [pyexiftool](https://github.com/smarnach/pyexiftool) didn't do quite what I wanted. If all you're after is the camera and shot info, that's available in `ZEXTENDEDATTRIBUTES` table. I've got an open issue [#11](https://github.com/RhetTbull/osxphotos/issues/11) to add this to osxphotos but it hasn't bubbled to the top of my backlog yet. osxphotos will give you the location info: `PhotoInfo.location` returns a tuple of (lat, lon) though this info is in ZEXTENDEDATTRIBUTES too (though it might not be correct as I believe Photos creates this table at import and the user might have changed the location of a photo, e.g. if camera didn't have GPS). ```sql CREATE TABLE ZEXTENDEDATTRIBUTES ( Z_PK INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, Z_ENT INTEGER, Z_OPT INTEGER, ZFLASHFIRED INTEGER, ZISO INTEGER, ZMETERINGMODE INTEGER, ZSAMPLERATE INTEGER, ZTRACKFORMAT INTEGER, ZWHITEBALANCE INTEGER, ZASSET INTEGER, ZAPERTURE FLOAT, ZBITRATE FLOAT, ZDURATION FLOAT, ZEXPOSUREBIAS FLOAT, ZFOCALLENGTH FLOAT, ZFPS FLOAT, ZLATITUDE FLOAT, ZLONGITUDE FLOAT, ZSHUTTERSPEED FLOAT, ZCAMERAMAKE VARCHAR, ZCAMERAMODEL VARCHAR, ZCODEC VARCHAR, ZLENSMODEL VARCHAR ); ``` | {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | Try out ExifReader 615626118 | |
| 628405453 | https://github.com/dogsheep/dogsheep-photos/issues/22#issuecomment-628405453 | https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/dogsheep-photos/issues/22 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDYyODQwNTQ1Mw== | RhetTbull 41546558 | 2020-05-14T05:59:53Z | 2020-05-14T05:59:53Z | CONTRIBUTOR | I've added support for the above exif data to [v0.28.17](https://github.com/RhetTbull/osxphotos/releases/tag/v0.28.17) of osxphotos. `PhotoInfo.exif_info` will return an `ExifInfo` [dataclass](https://docs.python.org/3/library/dataclasses.html) object with the following properties: ```python flash_fired: bool iso: int metering_mode: int sample_rate: int track_format: int white_balance: int aperture: float bit_rate: float duration: float exposure_bias: float focal_length: float fps: float latitude: float longitude: float shutter_speed: float camera_make: str camera_model: str codec: str lens_model: str ``` It's not all the EXIF data available in most files but is the data Photos deems important to save. Of course, you can get all the exif_data Note: this only works in Photos 5. As best as I can tell, EXIF data is not stored in the database for earlier versions. | {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | Try out ExifReader 615626118 | |
| 748436779 | https://github.com/dogsheep/dogsheep-photos/issues/15#issuecomment-748436779 | https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/dogsheep-photos/issues/15 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc0ODQzNjc3OQ== | RhetTbull 41546558 | 2020-12-19T07:49:00Z | 2020-12-19T07:49:00Z | CONTRIBUTOR | @nickvazz ZGENERICASSET changed to ZASSET in Big Sur. Here's a list of other changes to the schema in Big Sur: https://github.com/RhetTbull/osxphotos/wiki/Changes-in-Photos-6---Big-Sur | {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | Expose scores from ZCOMPUTEDASSETATTRIBUTES 612151767 | |
| 748562288 | https://github.com/dogsheep/dogsheep-photos/issues/15#issuecomment-748562288 | https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/dogsheep-photos/issues/15 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc0ODU2MjI4OA== | RhetTbull 41546558 | 2020-12-20T04:44:22Z | 2020-12-20T04:44:22Z | CONTRIBUTOR | @nickvazz @simonw I opened a [PR](https://github.com/dogsheep/dogsheep-photos/pull/31) that replaces the SQL for `ZCOMPUTEDASSETATTRIBUTES` to use osxphotos which now exposes all this data and has been updated for Big Sur. I did regression tests to confirm the extracted data is identical, with one exception which should not affect operation: the old code pulled data from `ZCOMPUTEDASSETATTRIBUTES` for missing photos while the main loop ignores missing photos and does not add them to `apple_photos`. The new code does not add rows to the `apple_photos_scores` table for missing photos. | {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | Expose scores from ZCOMPUTEDASSETATTRIBUTES 612151767 | |
| 748562330 | https://github.com/dogsheep/dogsheep-photos/pull/31#issuecomment-748562330 | https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/dogsheep-photos/issues/31 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc0ODU2MjMzMA== | RhetTbull 41546558 | 2020-12-20T04:45:08Z | 2020-12-20T04:45:08Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Fixes the issue mentioned here: https://github.com/dogsheep/dogsheep-photos/issues/15#issuecomment-748436115 | {"total_count": 1, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 1, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | Update for Big Sur 771511344 | |
| 778246347 | https://github.com/dogsheep/dogsheep-photos/issues/33#issuecomment-778246347 | https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/dogsheep-photos/issues/33 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc3ODI0NjM0Nw== | RhetTbull 41546558 | 2021-02-12T15:00:43Z | 2021-02-12T15:00:43Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Yes, Big Sur Photos database doesn't have `ZGENERICASSET` table. PR #31 will fix this. | {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | photo-to-sqlite: command not found 803338729 | |
| 934372104 | https://github.com/dogsheep/dogsheep-photos/issues/3#issuecomment-934372104 | https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/dogsheep-photos/issues/3 | IC_kwDOD079W843sWMI | RhetTbull 41546558 | 2021-10-05T12:38:24Z | 2021-10-05T12:38:24Z | CONTRIBUTOR | As dogsheep-photos already uses [osxphotos](https://github.com/RhetTbull/osxphotos) to load photos you can access the EXIF data via osxphotos. Apple Photos imports a small subset of EXIF data at the time the photo is imported and osxphotos provides this via the [exif_info](https://github.com/RhetTbull/osxphotos#exifinfo) property. If you want the full EXIF data, osxphotos also provides a wrapper around [exiftool](https://github.com/RhetTbull/osxphotos#exiftool). | {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | Import EXIF data into SQLite - lens used, ISO, aperture etc 602533481 | |
| 1468898285 | https://github.com/dogsheep/apple-notes-to-sqlite/issues/8#issuecomment-1468898285 | https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/apple-notes-to-sqlite/issues/8 | IC_kwDOJHON9s5XjZvt | RhetTbull 41546558 | 2023-03-14T22:00:21Z | 2023-03-14T22:00:21Z | NONE | Well that's embarrassing. I made a fork using macnotesapp and it's actually slower. This is because the Scripting Bridge sometimes fails to return the folder and thus macnotesapp resorts to AppleScript in this situation. The repeated AppleScript calls on a large library are slower than your "slurp it all in" approach. I've got some ideas about how to improve this--will make another attempt if I can fix the issues. | {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | Increase performance using macnotesapp 1617823309 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] (
[html_url] TEXT,
[issue_url] TEXT,
[id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
[node_id] TEXT,
[user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
[created_at] TEXT,
[updated_at] TEXT,
[author_association] TEXT,
[body] TEXT,
[reactions] TEXT,
[issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id])
, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue]
ON [issue_comments] ([issue]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user]
ON [issue_comments] ([user]);