issue_comments
6 rows where user = 50527
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: issue_url, issue, created_at (date), updated_at (date)
| id ▼ | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | issue | performed_via_github_app |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 344125441 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/pull/81#issuecomment-344125441 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/81 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM0NDEyNTQ0MQ== | jefftriplett 50527 | 2017-11-14T02:24:54Z | 2017-11-14T02:24:54Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Oops, if I jumped the gun. I saw the project in my github activity feed and saw some low hanging fruit :) | {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | :fire: Removes DS_Store 273595473 | |
| 735279355 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/pull/1112#issuecomment-735279355 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1112 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDczNTI3OTM1NQ== | jefftriplett 50527 | 2020-11-28T19:21:09Z | 2020-11-28T19:21:09Z | CONTRIBUTOR | (Even more annoying is that I see my editor leaked an extra delete space at the end of the line. I'm happy to rebuild this to be less annoying, but you probably don't want the changelog update either way) | {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | Fix --metadata doc usage 752749485 | |
| 735281577 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/493#issuecomment-735281577 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/493 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDczNTI4MTU3Nw== | jefftriplett 50527 | 2020-11-28T19:39:53Z | 2020-11-28T19:39:53Z | CONTRIBUTOR | I was confused by `--config` and I tried passing the json from datasette-ripgrep into `config.json` just as a wild guess. A short term solution might be pointing out in plugins that their snippet json can go in `metadata.json` at least makes it easier to search for config options or to know where to start if someone is new. | {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | Rename metadata.json to config.json 449886319 | |
| 748305976 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/493#issuecomment-748305976 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/493 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc0ODMwNTk3Ng== | jefftriplett 50527 | 2020-12-18T20:34:39Z | 2020-12-18T20:34:39Z | CONTRIBUTOR | I can't keep up with the renaming contexts, but I like having the ability to run datasette+ datasette-ripgrep against different configs: ```shell datasette serve --metadata=./metadata.json ``` I have one for all of my code and one per client who has lots of code. So as long as I can point to datasette to something, it's easy to work with. | {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | Rename metadata.json to config.json 449886319 | |
| 1224382336 | https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/467#issuecomment-1224382336 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/467 | IC_kwDOCGYnMM5I-peA | jefftriplett 50527 | 2022-08-23T17:16:13Z | 2022-08-23T17:16:13Z | CONTRIBUTOR | > Should passing `alter=True` also drop any columns that aren't included in the new table structure? > > It could even spot column types that aren't correct and fix those. > > Is that consistent with the expectations set by how `alter=True` works elsewhere? I would lean towards not dropping them (or making a `drop=True` or `drop_columns=True`or `drop_missing_columns=True`) to work with existing tables easier. I do like that sqlite-utils mostly just works with existing tables but it's also nice to add to existing fields in a few cases. | {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | Mechanism for ensuring a table has all the columns 1348169997 | |
| 1256781274 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1817#issuecomment-1256781274 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1817 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5K6PXa | jefftriplett 50527 | 2022-09-23T22:59:46Z | 2022-09-23T22:59:46Z | CONTRIBUTOR | While you are adding features, would you be future-proofing your APIs if you switched over some arguments over to keyword-only arguments or would that be too disruptive? Thinking out loud: ``` async def render_template( self, templates, *, context=None, plugin_context=None, request=None, view_name=None ): ``` | {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} | Expose `sql` and `params` arguments to various plugin hooks 1384273985 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] (
[html_url] TEXT,
[issue_url] TEXT,
[id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
[node_id] TEXT,
[user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
[created_at] TEXT,
[updated_at] TEXT,
[author_association] TEXT,
[body] TEXT,
[reactions] TEXT,
[issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id])
, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue]
ON [issue_comments] ([issue]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user]
ON [issue_comments] ([user]);