issue_comments

Table actions

1 row where user = 601316

✎ View and edit SQL

This data as json, CSV (advanced)

Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)

id ▼ html_url issue_url node_id user created_at updated_at author_association body reactions issue performed_via_github_app
782756398 https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/782#issuecomment-782756398 https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/782 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc4Mjc1NjM5OA== simonrjones 601316 2021-02-20T22:05:48Z 2021-02-20T22:05:48Z NONE > I think it’s a good idea if the top level item of the response JSON is always an object, rather than an array, at least as the default. I agree it is more predictable if the top level item is an object with a rows or data object that contains an array of data, which then allows for other top-level meta data. I can see the argument for removing this and just using an array for convenience - but I think that's OK as an option (as you have now). Rather than have lots of top-level keys you could have a "meta" object to contain non-data stuff. You could use something like "links" for API endpoint URLs (or use a standard like HAL). Which would then leave the top level a bit cleaner - if that's what you what. Have you had much feedback from users who use the Datasette API a lot? {"total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0} Redesign default .json format 627794879  

Advanced export

JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object

CSV options: 

CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] (
   [html_url] TEXT,
   [issue_url] TEXT,
   [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
   [node_id] TEXT,
   [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
   [created_at] TEXT,
   [updated_at] TEXT,
   [author_association] TEXT,
   [body] TEXT,
   [reactions] TEXT,
   [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id])
, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue]
                ON [issue_comments] ([issue]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user]
                ON [issue_comments] ([user]);