id,node_id,number,title,user,state,locked,assignee,milestone,comments,created_at,updated_at,closed_at,author_association,pull_request,body,repo,type,active_lock_reason,performed_via_github_app,reactions,draft,state_reason
1097087280,I_kwDOCGYnMM5BZDkw,368,Offer `python -m sqlite_utils` as an alternative to `sqlite-utils`,9599,closed,0,,7558727,3,2022-01-09T02:29:30Z,2022-01-10T19:27:20Z,2022-01-09T02:40:50Z,OWNER,,"> Add this to `sqlite_utils/cli.py`:
>
> ```python
> if __name__ == ""__main__"":
>     cli()
> ```
> Now the tool can be run using `python -m sqlite_utils.cli --help`

_Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/364#issuecomment-1008214998_",140912432,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/368/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed
1097135732,I_kwDOCGYnMM5BZPZ0,373,List `--fmt` options in the docs ,9599,closed,0,,7558727,3,2022-01-09T08:22:11Z,2022-01-10T19:27:24Z,2022-01-09T17:49:00Z,OWNER,,https://sqlite-utils.datasette.io/en/stable/cli.html#table-formatted-output currently cheats and tells the user to run `--help` - can fix this using `cog`. ,140912432,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/373/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed
1097251014,I_kwDOCGYnMM5BZrjG,375,`sqlite-utils bulk` command,9599,closed,0,,7558727,3,2022-01-09T17:12:38Z,2022-01-11T02:12:58Z,2022-01-11T02:10:55Z,OWNER,,"The `.executemany()` method is a very efficient way to execute the same SQL query against a huge list of parameters.

`sqlite-utils insert` supports a bunch of ways of loading a list of dictionaries - from CSV, TSV, JSON, newline JSON and more thanks to:
- #361

What if you could load a list of dictionaries and provide a SQL query with `:named` parameters that correspond to keys in those dictionaries instead?

This would need to be a new command - I thought about adding a `--sql` option to `insert` but that doesn't make sense as that command already requires a table name.",140912432,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/375/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed
1097477582,PR_kwDOCGYnMM4wtl17,377,`sqlite-utils bulk` command,9599,closed,0,,7558727,3,2022-01-10T05:34:24Z,2022-01-11T02:10:57Z,2022-01-11T02:10:54Z,OWNER,simonw/sqlite-utils/pulls/377,"Refs #375

Still needs:

- [x] Refactor `@insert_upsert_options` so that it doesn't duplicate `@import_options`
- [x] Tests
- [x] Documentation
- [x] Try it against a really big file",140912432,pull,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/377/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",0,