id,node_id,number,title,user,state,locked,assignee,milestone,comments,created_at,updated_at,closed_at,author_association,pull_request,body,repo,type,active_lock_reason,performed_via_github_app,reactions,draft,state_reason
627794879,MDU6SXNzdWU2Mjc3OTQ4Nzk=,782,Redesign default .json format,9599,open,0,,8755003,54,2020-05-30T18:47:07Z,2023-01-17T02:05:45Z,,OWNER,,The default JSON just isn't right. I find myself using `?_shape=array` for almost everything I build against the API.,107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/782/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,
1197926598,I_kwDOBm6k_c5HZujG,1705,How to upgrade your plugin for 1.0 documentation,9599,open,0,,8755003,1,2022-04-08T23:16:47Z,2022-12-13T05:29:05Z,,OWNER,,"Among other things, needed by:
- #1704",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1705/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,
1200649124,I_kwDOBm6k_c5HkHOk,1708,Datasette 1.0 alpha upcoming release notes,9599,open,0,,8755003,2,2022-04-11T22:57:12Z,2022-12-13T05:29:06Z,,OWNER,,"I'm going to try writing the release notes first, to see if that helps unblock me.

# ⚠️ Any release notes in this issue are a draft, and should not be treated as the real thing ⚠️ ",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1708/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,
1200649502,I_kwDOBm6k_c5HkHUe,1709,Redesigned JSON API with ?_extra= parameters,9599,open,0,,8755003,1,2022-04-11T22:57:49Z,2022-12-13T05:29:06Z,,OWNER,,This will be the single biggest breaking change for the 1.0 release.,107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1709/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,
1200650491,I_kwDOBm6k_c5HkHj7,1711,Template context powered entirely by the JSON API format,9599,open,0,,8755003,1,2022-04-11T22:59:27Z,2022-12-13T05:29:06Z,,OWNER,,Datasette 1.0 will have a stable template context. I'm going to achieve this by refactoring the templates to work only with keys returned by the API (or some of its extras) - then the API documentation will double up as template documentation.,107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1711/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,
1216436131,I_kwDOBm6k_c5IgVej,1721,"Implement plugin hooks: `register_table_extras`, `register_row_extras`, `register_query_extras`",9599,open,0,,8755003,0,2022-04-26T20:21:49Z,2022-12-13T05:29:07Z,,OWNER,,"Designed in:
- #1720

Part of:
- #262
- #1709",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1721/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,
1219385669,I_kwDOBm6k_c5IrllF,1729,Implement ?_extra and new API design for TableView,9599,open,0,,8755003,12,2022-04-28T22:28:14Z,2022-12-13T05:29:07Z,,OWNER,,"Part of:
- #262
- #1518",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1729/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,
1426080014,I_kwDOBm6k_c5VAEEO,1867,/db/table/-/rename API (also allows atomic replace),9599,open,0,,8755003,1,2022-10-27T18:13:23Z,2023-01-09T15:34:12Z,,OWNER,,"> There's one catch with batched inserts: if your CLI tool fails half way through you could end up with a partially populated table - since a bunch of batches will have succeeded first.
>
> ...
>
> If people care about that kind of thing they could always push all of their inserts to a table called `_tablename` and then atomically rename that once they've uploaded all of the data (assuming I provide an atomic-rename-this-table mechanism).

_Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1866#issuecomment-1293893789_
      ",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1867/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,
1428630253,I_kwDOBm6k_c5VJyrt,1873,Ensure insert API has good tests for rowid and compound primark key tables,9599,open,0,,8755003,11,2022-10-30T06:22:17Z,2022-12-13T05:29:08Z,,OWNER,,"Following:
- #1866

I need to design and implement various edge-cases or primary keys:

- Table without an auto-incrementing primary key
- Table with compound primary keys
- Table with just a `rowid`",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1873/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,reopened
1430797211,I_kwDOBm6k_c5VSDub,1875,Figure out design for JSON errors (consider RFC 7807),9599,open,0,,8755003,7,2022-11-01T03:14:15Z,2022-12-13T05:29:08Z,,OWNER,,"https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-httpapi-rfc7807bis/ is a brand new standard.

Since I need a neat, predictable format for my JSON errors, maybe I should use this one?",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1875/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,
1447465004,I_kwDOBm6k_c5WRpAs,1889,Ability to create new tokens via the API,9599,open,0,,8755003,0,2022-11-14T06:21:36Z,2022-12-13T05:29:08Z,,OWNER,,"Refs:
- #1850

Initially I decided that the API shouldn't be able to create new tokens at all - I don't like the idea of an API token holder creating themselves additional tokens.

Then I realized that two of the API features are specifically more useful if you can generate fresh tokens via the API:

- Tokes that expire after a time limit are MUCH more useful if they can be automatically generated
- Likewise, tokens that are restricted to a subset of permissions (see #1855) make more sense to be generated like this, especially in conjunction with expiry times",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1889/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,
1468495358,I_kwDOBm6k_c5Xh3X-,1910,Check incoming column types on various write APIs,9599,open,0,,8755003,0,2022-11-29T18:09:10Z,2022-12-13T05:29:09Z,,OWNER,,"> I do think this needs type checking - I just tried and you really can send a string to an integer column and have it work, which feels bad.

_Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1863#issuecomment-1331089156_
      ",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1910/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,
1468689139,I_kwDOBm6k_c5Ximrz,1914,Finalize design of JSON for Datasette 1.0,9599,open,0,,8755003,1,2022-11-29T20:59:10Z,2022-12-13T06:15:54Z,,OWNER,,"Tracking issue.

- [ ] #1709
- [ ] #1729
- [ ] #1875",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1914/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,
1490576818,I_kwDOBm6k_c5Y2GWy,1943,`/-/permissions` should list available permissions,9599,open,0,,8755003,1,2022-12-11T23:38:03Z,2022-12-15T00:41:37Z,,OWNER,,"> Idea: a `/-/permissions` introspection endpoint for listing registered permissions

_Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1939#issuecomment-1345691103_
      ",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1943/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,
1493471221,I_kwDOBm6k_c5ZBI_1,1949,`.json` errors should be returned as JSON,9599,open,0,,8755003,10,2022-12-13T06:14:12Z,2022-12-15T00:46:27Z,,OWNER,,"Eg the error in this issue:
- #1945 ",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1949/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,
1495716243,I_kwDOBm6k_c5ZJtGT,1952,Improvements to /-/create-token restrictions interface,9599,open,0,,8755003,1,2022-12-14T05:22:39Z,2022-12-14T05:23:13Z,,OWNER,,"> It would be neat not to show write permissions against immutable databases too - and not hard from a performance perspective since it doesn't involve hundreds more permission checks.
>
> That will need permissions to grow a flag for if they need a mutable database though, which is a bigger job.

_Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1947#issuecomment-1350414402_

Also, DO show the `_memory` database there if Datasette was started in `--crossdb` mode.",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1952/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,
1633077183,I_kwDOBm6k_c5hVse_,2041,Remove obsolete table POST code,9599,closed,0,,8755003,2,2023-03-21T01:01:40Z,2023-03-21T01:17:44Z,2023-03-21T01:17:43Z,OWNER,,"Spotted this in:
- #1999

`POST /db/table` currently executes obsolete code for inserting a row - I replaced that with `/db/table/-/insert` in 
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/commit/6e788b49edf4f842c0817f006eb9d865778eea5e but forgot to remove the old code.",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/2041/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed
1646734246,I_kwDOBm6k_c5iJyum,2049,Custom SQL queries should use new JSON ?_extra= format,9599,open,0,,8755003,4,2023-03-30T00:42:53Z,2023-04-05T23:29:27Z,,OWNER,,"Related:
- #262

I've made the change to the table view, now I need the new format to work for arbitrary SQL queries too.

Note that this incorporates both arbitrary SQL queries and canned queries.",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/2049/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,
1649791661,I_kwDOBm6k_c5iVdKt,2050,Row page JSON should use new ?_extra= format,9599,open,0,,8755003,1,2023-03-31T17:56:53Z,2023-03-31T17:59:49Z,,OWNER,,"https://latest.datasette.io/fixtures/facetable/2.json

Related:
- #2049
- #1709 ",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/2050/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,