{"id": 577302229, "node_id": "MDU6SXNzdWU1NzczMDIyMjk=", "number": 91, "title": "Enable ordering FTS results by rank", "user": {"value": 416374, "label": "gfrmin"}, "state": "closed", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 6079500, "label": "3.0"}, "comments": 1, "created_at": "2020-03-07T08:43:51Z", "updated_at": "2020-11-06T23:53:26Z", "closed_at": "2020-11-06T23:53:25Z", "author_association": "NONE", "pull_request": null, "body": "According to https://www.sqlite.org/fts5.html (not sure about FTS4) results can be sorted by relevance. At the moment results are returned by default by `rowid`. Perhaps a flag can be added to the `search` method?", "repo": {"value": 140912432, "label": "sqlite-utils"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/91/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": "completed"}
{"id": 735532751, "node_id": "MDU6SXNzdWU3MzU1MzI3NTE=", "number": 192, "title": "sqlite-utils search command", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "closed", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 6079500, "label": "3.0"}, "comments": 9, "created_at": "2020-11-03T18:07:59Z", "updated_at": "2020-11-08T17:07:01Z", "closed_at": "2020-11-08T17:07:01Z", "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "A command that knows how to run a search against a FTS enabled table and return results ranked by relevance.", "repo": {"value": 140912432, "label": "sqlite-utils"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/192/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": "completed"}
{"id": 735648209, "node_id": "MDU6SXNzdWU3MzU2NDgyMDk=", "number": 193, "title": "--tsv output format option", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "closed", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 6079500, "label": "3.0"}, "comments": 0, "created_at": "2020-11-03T21:31:18Z", "updated_at": "2020-11-07T00:09:52Z", "closed_at": "2020-11-07T00:09:52Z", "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "We already support `--csv` for output, and the `insert` command accepts `--tsv`. The output format options should accept `--tsv` too.", "repo": {"value": 140912432, "label": "sqlite-utils"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/193/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": "completed"}
{"id": 735650864, "node_id": "MDU6SXNzdWU3MzU2NTA4NjQ=", "number": 194, "title": "3.0 release with some minor breaking changes", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "closed", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 6079500, "label": "3.0"}, "comments": 3, "created_at": "2020-11-03T21:36:31Z", "updated_at": "2020-11-08T17:19:35Z", "closed_at": "2020-11-08T17:19:34Z", "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "While working on search (#192) I've spotted a few small changes I would like to make that would break backwards compatibility in minor ways, hence requiring a 3.x release.\r\n\r\n`db[table].search()` - I would like this to default to sorting by rank\r\n\r\nAlso I'd like to free up the `-c` and `-f` options for other purposes from the standard output formats here:\r\n\r\nhttps://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/blob/43eae8b193d362f2b292df73e087ed6f10838144/sqlite_utils/cli.py#L48-L58\r\n\r\nI'd like `-f` to be used to indicate a full-text search column during an insert and `-c` to indicate a column (so you can specify which columns you want to output).", "repo": {"value": 140912432, "label": "sqlite-utils"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/194/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": "completed"}
{"id": 737153927, "node_id": "MDU6SXNzdWU3MzcxNTM5Mjc=", "number": 197, "title": "Rethink how table.search() method works", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "closed", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 6079500, "label": "3.0"}, "comments": 5, "created_at": "2020-11-05T18:04:34Z", "updated_at": "2020-11-08T17:07:37Z", "closed_at": "2020-11-08T17:07:37Z", "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "I need to improve this method to help build `sqlite-utils search` in #192 (PR is #195).\r\n\r\nThe challenge is deciding how it should handle sorting by relevance - especially since that is easy in FTS5 but not at all easy in FTS4.\r\n\r\n> Latest test failure:\r\n> ```\r\n> 114  ->\t        assert [(\"racoons are biting trash pandas\", \"USA\", \"bar\")] == table.search(\r\n> 115  \t            \"bite\", order=\"rowid\"\r\n> 116  \t        )\r\n> 117  \t\r\n> 118  \t\r\n> 119  \tdef test_optimize_fts(fresh_db):\r\n> (Pdb) table.search(\"bite\")\r\n> [(2, 'racoons are biting trash pandas', 'USA', 'bar', -9.641434262948206e-07)]\r\n> ```\r\n> The problem here is that the `table.search()` method now behaves differently for FTS4 v.s. FTS5 tables.\r\n> \r\n> With FTS4 you get back just the table columns.\r\n>\r\n> With FTS5 you also get back the `rowid` as the first column and the `rank` score as the last column.\r\n> \r\n> This is weird. It also makes me question whether having `.search()` return a list of tuples is the right API design.\r\n\r\n_Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/pull/195#issuecomment-722542895_", "repo": {"value": 140912432, "label": "sqlite-utils"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/197/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": "completed"}
{"id": 738115165, "node_id": "MDU6SXNzdWU3MzgxMTUxNjU=", "number": 200, "title": "sqlite-utils rows -c option", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "closed", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 6079500, "label": "3.0"}, "comments": 1, "created_at": "2020-11-07T00:22:12Z", "updated_at": "2020-11-07T00:28:48Z", "closed_at": "2020-11-07T00:28:47Z", "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "To let you specify the exact columns you want. Based on the `-c` option to `sqlite-utils search` in #192.", "repo": {"value": 140912432, "label": "sqlite-utils"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/200/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": "completed"}
{"id": 738128913, "node_id": "MDU6SXNzdWU3MzgxMjg5MTM=", "number": 201, "title": ".search(columns=) and sqlite-utils search -c ... bug", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "closed", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 6079500, "label": "3.0"}, "comments": 1, "created_at": "2020-11-07T01:27:26Z", "updated_at": "2020-11-08T16:54:15Z", "closed_at": "2020-11-08T16:54:15Z", "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "Both `table.search(columns=)` and the `sqlite-utils search -c` option do not work as expected - they always return both the `rowid` and the `rank` columns even if those have not been requested.\r\n\r\nThis should be fixed before the 3.0 non-alpha release.", "repo": {"value": 140912432, "label": "sqlite-utils"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/201/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": "completed"}